Skin Cancer Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy; Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 8, 8036 Graz, Austria.
Clin Dermatol. 2014 Jan-Feb;32(1):88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2013.05.029.
The clinical recognition of lentigo maligna (LM) in the mottled chronic sun-damaged skin can be challenging, because it shares many clinical features with other pigmented macules that commonly arise on sun-damaged skin. These include solar lentigo, flat seborrheic keratosis, and pigmented actinic keratosis, but almost never "nevus." The reason nevus is not included in the differential diagnosis of LM can be explained by the fact that the stereotypical appearance of a facial nevus differs remarkably from that of an LM. Facial nevi in adults are usually nodular, dome-shaped, well-defined, and hypopigmented (i.e., intradermal nevus of the Miescher type), whereas LM typically appears as a flat, ill-defined, and pigmented macule. Although this concept based on clinical observations sounds reasonable, clinicians apply it often only unconsciously and accept a given histopathologic diagnosis of a "junctional or lentiginous nevus" of a flat pigmented facial macule without the necessary criticism about its clinicopathologic validity.
临床识别良性色素痣(LM)在斑驳的慢性日晒损伤的皮肤可能具有挑战性,因为它与其他常见于日晒损伤皮肤的色素斑具有许多共同的临床特征。这些包括日光性雀斑、扁平脂溢性角化病和色素性光化性角化病,但几乎从不包括“痣”。LM 鉴别诊断中不包括痣的原因可以解释为典型的面部痣的外观与 LM 的外观有很大的不同。成人面部痣通常为结节状、半球形、界限清楚且色素减退(即 Miescher 型真皮内痣),而 LM 通常表现为扁平、界限不清且色素沉着的斑片。尽管基于临床观察的这种概念听起来合理,但临床医生通常只是无意识地应用它,并接受对扁平色素性面部斑片的“交界性或痣样痣”的特定组织病理学诊断,而没有对其临床病理学有效性进行必要的批评。