Skin Cancer Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Clin Dermatol. 2014 Jan-Feb;32(1):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2013.05.030.
The differential diagnosis of pigmented macules on the mottled chronic sun-damaged skin of the face is challenging and includes lentigo maligna (LM), pigmented actinic (solar) keratosis, solar lentigo, and lichen-planus-like keratosis. Although dermatoscopy improves the diagnostic accuracy of the unaided eye, the accurate diagnosis and management of pigmented facial macules remains one of the most challenging scenarios in daily practice. This is related to the fact that pigmented actinic (solar) keratosis, lichen-planus-like keratosis, and LM may reveal overlapping criteria, making their differential diagnosis clinically difficult. For this reason, practical rules have been introduced, which should help to minimize the risk for inappropriate diagnosis and management of LM.
面部斑驳的慢性日晒损伤皮肤的色素性斑的鉴别诊断具有挑战性,包括恶性雀斑样痣(LM)、色素性光化性(日光性)角化病、日光性雀斑和扁平苔藓样角化病。虽然皮肤镜检查提高了未辅助肉眼的诊断准确性,但色素性面部斑的准确诊断和管理仍然是日常实践中最具挑战性的情况之一。这与以下事实有关:色素性光化性(日光性)角化病、扁平苔藓样角化病和 LM 可能显示出重叠的标准,使得它们的鉴别诊断在临床上具有难度。出于这个原因,已经引入了实用规则,这些规则应该有助于最大限度地降低对 LM 的不适当诊断和管理的风险。