Department of Legal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba city, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Forensic Sci Int. 2013 Dec 10;233(1-3):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.08.027. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
Although electrolyte analysis of pleural effusion at autopsy is useful for the diagnosis of water aspiration (i.e., drowning), the method of comparing each level of sodium (Na(+)), potassium (K(+)), and chloride (Cl(-)) ions does not clearly differentiate between freshwater drowning, seawater drowning, and non-drowning. Therefore, here we introduce the summation of Na(+), K(+), and Cl(-) levels, that is SUM(Na+K+Cl), as a modified diagnostic indicator. In 21 autopsy cases of freshwater drowning, 32 cases of seawater drowning, and 43 non-drowning controls (with pleural effusion), mean SUM(Na+K+Cl) differed significantly between the groups (188.8±33.2, 403.5±107.9, and 239.3±21.7 mEq/L, respectively). We defined a SUM(Na+K+Cl) cut-off value of <195.9 mEq/L as strongly suggestive of freshwater aspiration and that of >282.7 mEq/L as strongly suggestive of seawater aspiration. When these values were applied to the two drowning groups, 15 cases (71%) of freshwater drowning and 29 cases (91%) of seawater drowning were diagnosed correctly. This new approach may be more valid than previous methods in cases found >2 days after death or those with substantial pleural effusion (>100 mL). For an additional 15 bathtub deaths, mean SUM(Na+K+Cl) was 198.8±40.0 mEq/L, and in 14 of these cases (93%) the relationship between cause of death and SUM(Na+K+Cl) could be explained using this method. Forensic pathologists should not depend exclusively on chemical findings and should consider also typical pathological indicators of drowning. This new method may be useful as a supplementary diagnostic tool when used alongside consideration of the pathological findings.
虽然尸检时胸腔积液的电解质分析有助于诊断吸入性水(即溺水),但比较每个钠离子(Na(+)、钾离子(K(+)和氯离子(Cl(-)水平的方法并不能清楚地区分淡水溺水、海水溺水和非溺水。因此,在这里我们引入钠离子(Na(+)、钾离子(K(+)和氯离子(Cl(-)水平的总和,即 SUM(Na+K+Cl),作为一种改良的诊断指标。在 21 例淡水溺水、32 例海水溺水和 43 例非溺水对照(有胸腔积液)的尸检病例中,各组的平均 SUM(Na+K+Cl)差异有统计学意义(分别为 188.8±33.2、403.5±107.9 和 239.3±21.7 mEq/L)。我们将 SUM(Na+K+Cl)截断值定义为<195.9 mEq/L 时强烈提示为淡水吸入,>282.7 mEq/L 时强烈提示为海水吸入。当将这些值应用于两个溺水组时,15 例(71%)淡水溺水和 29 例(91%)海水溺水的诊断正确。与之前的方法相比,这种新方法在死后 2 天以上或胸腔积液大量(>100 毫升)的病例中可能更有效。对于另外 15 例浴盆死亡病例,平均 SUM(Na+K+Cl)为 198.8±40.0 mEq/L,其中 14 例(93%)可以用这种方法解释死因与 SUM(Na+K+Cl)之间的关系。法医病理学家不应仅依赖于化学发现,还应考虑溺水的典型病理指标。这种新方法可能是一种有用的辅助诊断工具,可与病理发现一起使用。