Cheung Jason Pui-Yin, Shigematsu Hideki, Cheung Kenneth Man-Chee
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 5/F Professorial Block, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, 102 Pokfulam Rd, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan.
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1476-83. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.054. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to assess patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. No single MRI sequence has been shown to be superior in spinal canal measurements. There are also cost concerns for the increased clinical and research use of MRI. Using only a single sequence may lower the financial burden; however, this requires spinal canal measurements in both T1 and T2 MRI to be reliable. Evidence for this is currently lacking.
The aim of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-reader reliability of MRI measurements of the lumbar spine and the reliability of measurements using T1- and T2-weighted MRI films.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective study.
Forty-two randomly selected patients who underwent spinal stenosis surgery.
Lumbar spinal canal measurements and reliability analysis between T1- and T2-weighted MRI.
Qualitative ratings of MRI features were performed according to previously published criteria by 2 independent readers (JP-YC, HS). Measurements in axial scan included midline anteroposterior (AP) vertebral body diameter, midvertebral body width, midline AP spinal canal diameter, midline AP dural sac diameter, spinal canal width/interpedicular distance, pedicle width (right and left), and lamina angle. Measurements in the sagittal scan included midline AP body diameter, midvertebral body height, and AP spinal canal diameter. Cronbach alpha was used to characterize intra- and inter-reader reliability for qualitative rating data. Similarly, T1 and T2 comparison also was performed in the same manner.
Good to excellent intra- and interobserver reliability was obtained for all measurements. Reliability analysis of all T1 and T2 measurements was excellent.
Either T1 or T2 images can be used for measurements of spinal canal dimensions. These findings are of importance, as not every patient undergoing preoperative MRI assessment will necessarily have both sequences performed and only a single sequence is required for research studies. Our findings are also of relevance in measurement of lumbar canal diameters.
磁共振成像(MRI)常用于评估腰椎管狭窄患者。尚无单一的MRI序列在椎管测量方面表现出优越性。随着MRI在临床和研究中的使用增加,成本问题也备受关注。仅使用单一序列可能会降低经济负担;然而,这需要T1和T2 MRI的椎管测量结果都可靠。目前缺乏这方面的证据。
本研究的目的是确定腰椎MRI测量的阅片者内和阅片者间可靠性,以及使用T1加权和T2加权MRI胶片测量的可靠性。
研究设计/设置:回顾性研究。
42例随机选择的接受椎管狭窄手术的患者。
腰椎管测量以及T1加权和T2加权MRI之间的可靠性分析。
由2名独立阅片者(JP - YC,HS)根据先前发表的标准对MRI特征进行定性评级。轴位扫描的测量包括椎体中线前后径、椎体中部宽度、椎管中线前后径、硬膜囊中线前后径、椎管宽度/椎弓根间距、椎弓根宽度(左右)和椎板角。矢状位扫描的测量包括椎体中线前后径、椎体中部高度和椎管前后径。使用Cronbach α系数来表征定性评级数据的阅片者内和阅片者间可靠性。同样,T1和T2的比较也以相同方式进行。
所有测量均获得了良好至优秀的阅片者内和阅片者间可靠性。所有T1和T2测量的可靠性分析结果均为优秀。
T1或T2图像均可用于椎管尺寸测量。这些发现很重要,因为并非每个接受术前MRI评估的患者都一定会进行两种序列的检查,而研究仅需要单一序列即可。我们的发现对于腰椎管直径的测量也具有相关性。