Schenck Catharina, van Susante Job, van Gorp Maarten, Belder Ruben, Vleggeert-Lankamp Carmen
Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Orthopaedics, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 May;158(5):981-8. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2777-5. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
In cases of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) treated with surgical decompression, a postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is sometimes required. In the experience of the investigators of this study, the obtained decompression observed on early postoperative MRI tends to be disappointing compared to the decompression achieved intraoperatively. This raises the question of whether the early postoperative MRI, performed after lumbar decompression, is a fair representation of the 'real' decompression. This study investigated the correlation between intraoperative and postoperative measurements of the lumbar spinal canal.
Twenty patients with LSS underwent surgical decompression on a single level. The orthopaedic surgeon performed direct intraoperative measurements of width, length and height of the spinal canal. Preoperative supine MR images and postoperative prone and supine MR images were acquired. Two radiologists (R.B. and M.G.) measured width, length and height of the spinal canal on the preoperative and postoperative MRIs. Intraoperative measurements were compared to measurements on postoperative MRI in prone position (thus reproducing the intraoperative situation) to avoid positioning bias. Preoperative and postoperative measurements on MR images were also compared. In addition to this, postoperative measurements on supine and prone MR images were also compared.
Interobserver reliability for MRI measurements by both radiologists was generally excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients ≥0.71). The postoperative spinal canal dimensions improved on both prone and supine MRI compared to the preoperative imaging (P < 0.05). Intraoperatively measured dimensions demonstrated a significantly greater height (difference 2.8 ± 3.3 [R.B.] and 1.9 ± 3.7 [M.G.]) and greater width (difference 2.1 ± 3.2 [R.B.] and 2.5 ± 2.7 [M.G.]) compared to postoperative MRI in the prone position (P < 0.05). Postoperative dural sac height was greater on the supine MRI compared to the prone MRI (P < 0.05).
Surgical decompression of the spinal canal effectively decreases the compression of the dural sac. However, early postoperative MRI after lumbar decompression does not adequately represent the decompression achieved intraoperatively.
在接受手术减压治疗的腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)病例中,有时需要进行术后磁共振成像(MRI)检查。根据本研究的研究者经验,与术中实现的减压效果相比,术后早期MRI所显示的减压效果往往不尽人意。这就引发了一个问题,即腰椎减压术后进行的早期MRI检查是否能真实反映“实际”的减压情况。本研究调查了腰椎管术中测量与术后测量之间的相关性。
20例LSS患者接受了单节段手术减压。骨科医生在术中直接测量椎管的宽度、长度和高度。采集术前仰卧位MR图像以及术后俯卧位和仰卧位MR图像。两名放射科医生(R.B.和M.G.)在术前和术后的MR图像上测量椎管的宽度、长度和高度。将术中测量结果与术后俯卧位MRI测量结果(从而再现术中情况)进行比较,以避免体位偏差。还比较了术前和术后MR图像上的测量结果。除此之外,还比较了仰卧位和俯卧位MR图像上的术后测量结果。
两位放射科医生对MRI测量的观察者间可靠性总体良好(组内相关系数≥0.71)。与术前成像相比,术后俯卧位和仰卧位MRI上的椎管尺寸均有所改善(P < 0.05)。与术后俯卧位MRI相比,术中测量的尺寸显示出显著更大的高度(差值分别为2.8 ± 3.3 [R.B.]和1.9 ± 3.7 [M.G.])和更大的宽度(差值分别为2.1 ± 3.2 [R.B.]和2.5 ± 2.7 [M.G.])(P < 0.05)。与俯卧位MRI相比,仰卧位MRI上术后硬脊膜囊高度更大(P < 0.05)。
椎管手术减压可有效减轻硬脊膜囊的压迫。然而,腰椎减压术后的早期MRI并不能充分反映术中实现的减压情况。