Stephan Astrid, Renom Guiteras Anna, Juchems Stefan, Meyer Gabriele
Universität Witten/Herdecke, Fakultät für Gesundheit, Department für Pflegewissenschaft, Witten.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013;107(9-10):597-605. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.10.018. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
In Germany as in other countries of the European Union (EU), the majority of people with dementia are cared for by their informal caregivers at home. Across countries, however, there are considerable differences in the time to nursing home admission. The European research project RightTimePlaceCare intends to establish good practice recommendations for how to sustain the preferred living situation as long as possible. The Balance of Care approach was used to develop these recommendations, which combines empirical data, cost estimates and expert consensus, and thus implemented in a multinational context for the first time.
In eight EU countries a survey was conducted among 2,014 people with dementia and their informal caregivers in nursing homes (n=1,223) or at home (n=791). Selected descriptive characteristics of the study participants were used for case type development. The case types were translated into 14 case vignettes, which were discussed by five to six expert panels (each consisting of three to four participants) per country. The experts (n=161) recommended the most suitable living place (at home or in a nursing home) and customised care packages for home care situations.
Across all countries, the experts predominantly recommended care at home for four of the case types whose reference group of study participants actually lived in a nursing home. These case types represent a relevant part of the study population. In Germany, the experts judged the case vignettes as realistic but criticised that information relevant for proper decision making was missing. Expert group discussions always ended in consensus, and care at home was predominately recommended. The proposed care packages most often comprised standard care services, and hence appeared to be realistic and feasible. The development of country-specific recommendations is still ongoing. In order to assess economic feasibility, estimated costs of home care packages will be compared with costs of nursing home care. Further outcomes like the quality of life will be considered for good practice recommendation finding.
Balance of Care supports the development of empirically based expert recommendations. The approach is widely applicable but seems to be particularly useful for the development of local custom-fit healthcare services. The clinical effectiveness, safety, and cost implications of the Balance of Care approach remain to be investigated in future studies.
在德国以及欧盟其他国家,大多数痴呆症患者由其非正式照护者在家中照料。然而,各国在养老院入住时间方面存在显著差异。欧洲研究项目“RightTimePlaceCare”旨在就如何尽可能长时间维持首选生活状况制定良好实践建议。采用了“照护平衡”方法来制定这些建议,该方法结合了实证数据、成本估算和专家共识,从而首次在跨国背景下得以实施。
在八个欧盟国家,对2014名痴呆症患者及其非正式照护者进行了调查,其中1223人在养老院,791人在家中。研究参与者的选定描述性特征用于病例类型的开发。病例类型被转化为14个病例 vignettes,每个国家由五到六个专家小组(每个小组由三到四名参与者组成)进行讨论。专家(共161人)推荐了最合适的居住场所(在家中或养老院)以及针对家庭照护情况的定制照护套餐。
在所有国家中,对于四种病例类型,专家们主要推荐在家中照护,而这些病例类型的研究参与者参考组实际居住在养老院。这些病例类型代表了研究人群的一个相关部分。在德国,专家们认为病例 vignettes 是现实的,但批评缺乏与正确决策相关的信息。专家小组讨论总是以达成共识结束,并且主要推荐在家中照护。提议的照护套餐大多包括标准照护服务,因此似乎是现实可行的。针对各国的具体建议仍在制定中。为了评估经济可行性,将把家庭照护套餐的估计成本与养老院照护成本进行比较。在寻找良好实践建议时,还将考虑生活质量等其他结果。
“照护平衡”支持基于实证的专家建议的制定。该方法具有广泛适用性,但似乎特别有助于开发适合当地的医疗保健服务。“照护平衡”方法的临床有效性、安全性和成本影响仍有待未来研究进行调查。