Kaminski-Hartenthaler Angela, Gartlehner Gerald, Kien Christina, Meerpohl Joerg J, Langer Gero, Perleth Matthias, Schünemann Holger
Donau-Universität Krems, Department für Evidenzbasierte Medizin und Klinische Epidemiologie, Krems, Österreich.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013;107(9-10):638-45. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.10.033. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
GRADE requires guideline developers to make an overall rating of confidence in estimates of effect (quality of evidence-high, moderate, low, or very low) for each important or critical outcome. GRADE suggests, for each outcome, the initial separate consideration of five domains of reasons for rating down the confidence in effect estimates, thereby allowing systematic review authors and guideline developers to arrive at an outcome-specific rating of confidence. Although this rating system represents discrete steps on an ordinal scale, it is helpful to view confidence in estimates as a continuum, and the final rating of confidence may differ from that suggested by separate consideration of each domain. An overall rating of confidence in estimates of effect is only relevant in settings when recommendations are being made. In general, it is based on the critical outcome that provides the lowest confidence.
GRADE要求指南制定者对每个重要或关键结局的效应估计值的置信度进行总体评级(证据质量——高、中、低或极低)。GRADE建议,对于每个结局,首先分别考虑降低效应估计值置信度的五个原因领域,从而使系统评价作者和指南制定者能够得出针对特定结局的置信度评级。尽管该评级系统表示的是有序尺度上的离散步骤,但将效应估计值的置信度视为一个连续体是有帮助的,并且最终的置信度评级可能与分别考虑每个领域所建议的评级不同。对效应估计值的置信度进行总体评级仅在做出推荐的情况下才有意义。一般来说,它基于提供最低置信度的关键结局。