Suppr超能文献

系统评价和随机试验的荟萃分析,用豆浆代替牛奶和中间代谢结果:了解在向植物性饮食过渡过程中,乳制品替代品对心血管代谢健康的影响。

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials of substituting soymilk for cow's milk and intermediate cardiometabolic outcomes: understanding the impact of dairy alternatives in the transition to plant-based diets on cardiometabolic health.

机构信息

Department of Nutritional Sciences, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Toronto 3D Knowledge Synthesis and Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2024 Aug 22;22(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03524-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dietary guidelines recommend a shift to plant-based diets. Fortified soymilk, a prototypical plant protein food used in the transition to plant-based diets, usually contains added sugars to match the sweetness of cow's milk and is classified as an ultra-processed food. Whether soymilk can replace minimally processed cow's milk without the adverse cardiometabolic effects attributed to added sugars and ultra-processed foods remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, to assess the effect of substituting soymilk for cow's milk and its modification by added sugars (sweetened versus unsweetened) on intermediate cardiometabolic outcomes.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched (through June 2024) for randomized controlled trials of ≥ 3 weeks in adults. Outcomes included established markers of blood lipids, glycemic control, blood pressure, inflammation, adiposity, renal disease, uric acid, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). A sub-study of lactose versus sucrose outside of a dairy-like matrix was conducted to explore the role of sweetened soymilk which followed the same methodology.

RESULTS

Eligibility criteria were met by 17 trials (n = 504 adults with a range of health statuses), assessing the effect of a median daily dose of 500 mL of soymilk (22 g soy protein and 17.2 g or 6.9 g/250 mL added sugars) in substitution for 500 mL of cow's milk (24 g milk protein and 24 g or 12 g/250 mL total sugars as lactose) on 19 intermediate outcomes. The substitution of soymilk for cow's milk resulted in moderate reductions in non-HDL-C (mean difference, - 0.26 mmol/L [95% confidence interval, - 0.43 to - 0.10]), systolic blood pressure (- 8.00 mmHg [- 14.89 to - 1.11]), and diastolic blood pressure (- 4.74 mmHg [- 9.17 to - 0.31]); small important reductions in LDL-C (- 0.19 mmol/L [- 0.29 to - 0.09]) and c-reactive protein (CRP) (- 0.82 mg/L [- 1.26 to - 0.37]); and trivial increases in HDL-C (0.05 mmol/L [0.00 to 0.09]). No other outcomes showed differences. There was no meaningful effect modification by added sugars across outcomes. The certainty of evidence was high for LDL-C and non-HDL-C; moderate for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, CRP, and HDL-C; and generally moderate-to-low for all other outcomes. We could not conduct the sub-study of the effect of lactose versus added sugars, as no eligible trials could be identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence provides a good indication that replacing cow's milk with soymilk (including sweetened soymilk) does not adversely affect established cardiometabolic risk factors and may result in advantages for blood lipids, blood pressure, and inflammation in adults with a mix of health statuses. The classification of plant-based dairy alternatives such as soymilk as ultra-processed may be misleading as it relates to their cardiometabolic effects and may need to be reconsidered in the transition to plant-based diets.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05637866.

摘要

背景

饮食指南建议转向植物性饮食。强化豆奶是一种用于向植物性饮食过渡的典型植物蛋白食品,通常会添加糖以匹配牛奶的甜度,并被归类为超加工食品。豆奶是否可以在不产生添加糖和超加工食品所带来的不良心脏代谢影响的情况下替代最低限度加工的牛奶,目前尚不清楚。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,评估了用豆奶替代牛奶及其添加糖(加糖与无糖)对中间心脏代谢结果的影响。

方法

通过 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(截至 2024 年 6 月)搜索了至少 3 周的成年人随机对照试验。结果包括已建立的血脂、血糖控制、血压、炎症、肥胖、肾脏疾病、尿酸和非酒精性脂肪肝疾病的标志物。两名独立的审查员提取数据并评估偏倚风险。使用 GRADE(推荐评估、制定与评价)评估证据的确定性。在不涉及乳类似基质的乳糖与蔗糖的亚研究中,进行了同样的方法来探索加糖豆奶的作用。

结果

有 17 项试验(n=504 名健康状况各异的成年人)符合入选标准,评估了每天中位数剂量为 500 毫升豆奶(22 克大豆蛋白和 17.2 克或 6.9 克/250 毫升添加糖)替代 500 毫升牛奶(24 克牛奶蛋白和 24 克或 12 克/250 毫升总糖作为乳糖)对 19 个中间结果的影响。用豆奶替代牛奶会导致非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(均值差,-0.26mmol/L[95%置信区间,-0.43 至-0.10])、收缩压(-8.00mmHg[-14.89 至-1.11])和舒张压(-4.74mmHg[-9.17 至-0.31])适度降低;低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(-0.19mmol/L[-0.29 至-0.09])和 C 反应蛋白(CRP)(-0.82mg/L[-1.26 至-0.37])有小而重要的降低;高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)略有增加(0.05mmol/L[0.00 至 0.09])。其他结果没有显示差异。在所有结果中,添加糖的效应修饰没有意义。低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇的证据确定性高;收缩压、舒张压、CRP 和 HDL-C 的证据确定性为中度;所有其他结果的证据确定性一般为中度至低度。我们无法进行乳糖与添加糖的效果亚研究,因为没有确定符合条件的试验。

结论

目前的证据表明,用豆奶(包括加糖豆奶)替代牛奶不会对已建立的心脏代谢危险因素产生不利影响,并且可能对各种健康状况成年人的血脂、血压和炎症产生有益影响。植物性乳制品替代品(如豆奶)被归类为超加工可能具有误导性,因为这与它们的心脏代谢效应有关,在向植物性饮食过渡时可能需要重新考虑。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符,NCT05637866。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4e8/11340166/a40aa442d99f/12916_2024_3524_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验