• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A generative probability model of joint label fusion for multi-atlas based brain segmentation.基于多图谱的脑部分割的联合标签融合生成概率模型。
Med Image Anal. 2014 Aug;18(6):881-90. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2013.10.013. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
2
Minimizing joint risk of mislabeling for iterative Patch-based label fusion.最小化基于迭代块的标签融合中标签错误标注的联合风险。
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2013;16(Pt 3):551-8. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40760-4_69.
3
Patch spaces and fusion strategies in patch-based label fusion.基于图块的标签融合中的补丁空间和融合策略。
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2019 Jan;71:79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
4
Hierarchical multi-atlas label fusion with multi-scale feature representation and label-specific patch partition.具有多尺度特征表示和特定标签块划分的分层多图谱标签融合
Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 1;106:34-46. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.025. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
5
Multi-Atlas Segmentation with Joint Label Fusion.基于联合标签融合的多图谱分割
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2013 Mar;35(3):611-23. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.143. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
6
A transversal approach for patch-based label fusion via matrix completion.一种基于矩阵补全的基于补丁的标签融合横向方法。
Med Image Anal. 2015 Aug;24(1):135-148. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
7
FCN Based Label Correction for Multi-Atlas Guided Organ Segmentation.基于 FCN 的多图谱引导器官分割标签校正。
Neuroinformatics. 2020 Apr;18(2):319-331. doi: 10.1007/s12021-019-09448-5.
8
Hierarchical label fusion with multiscale feature representation and label-specific patch partition.具有多尺度特征表示和特定标签补丁划分的分层标签融合
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2014;17(Pt 1):299-306. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10404-1_38.
9
Progressive multi-atlas label fusion by dictionary evolution.基于字典进化的渐进式多图谱标签融合。
Med Image Anal. 2017 Feb;36:162-171. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
10
Robust multi-atlas label propagation by deep sparse representation.基于深度稀疏表示的鲁棒多图谱标签传播
Pattern Recognit. 2017 Mar;63:511-517. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.09.028. Epub 2016 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
OpenMAP-T1: A Rapid Deep-Learning Approach to Parcellate 280 Anatomical Regions to Cover the Whole Brain.OpenMAP-T1:一种快速深度学习方法,可将 280 个解剖区域分割为覆盖整个大脑的区域。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Nov;45(16):e70063. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70063.
2
A cascaded nested network for 3T brain MR image segmentation guided by 7T labeling.一种由7T标记引导的用于3T脑磁共振图像分割的级联嵌套网络。
Pattern Recognit. 2022 Apr;124. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108420. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
3
Deep convolutional neural network for hippocampus segmentation with boundary region refinement.基于边界区域细化的深度卷积神经网络的海马体分割。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2023 Sep;61(9):2329-2339. doi: 10.1007/s11517-023-02836-9. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
4
Deep 3D Neural Network for Brain Structures Segmentation Using Self-Attention Modules in MRI Images.基于 MRI 图像自注意力模块的深度 3D 神经网络脑结构分割。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 27;22(7):2559. doi: 10.3390/s22072559.
5
A novel 5D brain parcellation approach based on spatio-temporal encoding of resting fMRI data from deep residual learning.一种基于深度残差学习的静息 fMRI 数据时空编码的新型 5D 脑区划分方法。
J Neurosci Methods. 2022 Mar 1;369:109478. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109478. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
6
Hippocampus Segmentation Method Based on Subspace Patch-Sparsity Clustering in Noisy Brain MRI.基于子空间斑块稀疏聚类的含噪脑 MRI 海马分割方法。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Sep 25;2021:3937222. doi: 10.1155/2021/3937222. eCollection 2021.
7
[Research on brain image segmentation based on deep learning].基于深度学习的脑图像分割研究
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Aug 25;37(4):721-729. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.201912050.
8
Automatic Labeling of MR Brain Images Through the Hashing Retrieval Based Atlas Forest.基于哈希检索图谱森林的 MR 脑图像自动标注。
J Med Syst. 2019 Jun 21;43(8):241. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1385-3.
9
PSACNN: Pulse sequence adaptive fast whole brain segmentation.PSACNN:脉冲序列自适应快速全脑分割。
Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 1;199:553-569. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.033. Epub 2019 May 24.
10
3D whole brain segmentation using spatially localized atlas network tiles.使用空间局部化图谱网络瓦片进行 3D 全脑分割。
Neuroimage. 2019 Jul 1;194:105-119. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.041. Epub 2019 Mar 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Accurate segmentation of brain images into 34 structures combining a non-stationary adaptive statistical atlas and a multi-atlas with applications to Alzheimer's disease.结合非平稳自适应统计图谱和多图谱将脑图像准确分割为34种结构及其在阿尔茨海默病中的应用
Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2013 Apr;2013:1202-1205. doi: 10.1109/ISBI.2013.6556696. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
2
S-HAMMER: hierarchical attribute-guided, symmetric diffeomorphic registration for MR brain images.S-HAMMER:用于磁共振脑图像的分层属性引导对称微分同胚配准
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Mar;35(3):1044-60. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22233. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
3
Deformable segmentation via sparse representation and dictionary learning.基于稀疏表示和字典学习的可变形分割。
Med Image Anal. 2012 Oct;16(7):1385-96. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
4
Rates of decline in Alzheimer disease decrease with age.阿尔茨海默病的衰退率随年龄增长而降低。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042325. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
5
Multi-Atlas Segmentation with Joint Label Fusion.基于联合标签融合的多图谱分割
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2013 Mar;35(3):611-23. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.143. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
6
LABEL: pediatric brain extraction using learning-based meta-algorithm.标签:基于学习的元算法进行儿科脑提取。
Neuroimage. 2012 Sep;62(3):1975-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.042. Epub 2012 May 24.
7
Regression-Based Label Fusion for Multi-Atlas Segmentation.基于回归的标签融合用于多图谱分割
Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit Workshops. 2011 Jun 20:1113-1120. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995382.
8
COORDINATE DESCENT ALGORITHMS FOR NONCONVEX PENALIZED REGRESSION, WITH APPLICATIONS TO BIOLOGICAL FEATURE SELECTION.用于非凸惩罚回归的坐标下降算法及其在生物特征选择中的应用
Ann Appl Stat. 2011 Jan 1;5(1):232-253. doi: 10.1214/10-AOAS388.
9
Towards robust and effective shape modeling: sparse shape composition.走向健壮而有效的形状建模:稀疏形状组合。
Med Image Anal. 2012 Jan;16(1):265-77. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
10
A supervised patch-based approach for human brain labeling.基于监督的斑块方法进行人脑标记。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011 Oct;30(10):1852-62. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2156806. Epub 2011 May 19.

基于多图谱的脑部分割的联合标签融合生成概率模型。

A generative probability model of joint label fusion for multi-atlas based brain segmentation.

作者信息

Wu Guorong, Wang Qian, Zhang Daoqiang, Nie Feiping, Huang Heng, Shen Dinggang

机构信息

Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.

Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA; Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.

出版信息

Med Image Anal. 2014 Aug;18(6):881-90. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2013.10.013. Epub 2013 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.media.2013.10.013
PMID:24315359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4024092/
Abstract

Automated labeling of anatomical structures in medical images is very important in many neuroscience studies. Recently, patch-based labeling has been widely investigated to alleviate the possible mis-alignment when registering atlases to the target image. However, the weights used for label fusion from the registered atlases are generally computed independently and thus lack the capability of preventing the ambiguous atlas patches from contributing to the label fusion. More critically, these weights are often calculated based only on the simple patch similarity, thus not necessarily providing optimal solution for label fusion. To address these limitations, we propose a generative probability model to describe the procedure of label fusion in a multi-atlas scenario, for the goal of labeling each point in the target image by the best representative atlas patches that also have the largest labeling unanimity in labeling the underlying point correctly. Specifically, sparsity constraint is imposed upon label fusion weights, in order to select a small number of atlas patches that best represent the underlying target patch, thus reducing the risks of including the misleading atlas patches. The labeling unanimity among atlas patches is achieved by exploring their dependencies, where we model these dependencies as the joint probability of each pair of atlas patches in correctly predicting the labels, by analyzing the correlation of their morphological error patterns and also the labeling consensus among atlases. The patch dependencies will be further recursively updated based on the latest labeling results to correct the possible labeling errors, which falls to the Expectation Maximization (EM) framework. To demonstrate the labeling performance, we have comprehensively evaluated our patch-based labeling method on the whole brain parcellation and hippocampus segmentation. Promising labeling results have been achieved with comparison to the conventional patch-based labeling method, indicating the potential application of the proposed method in the future clinical studies.

摘要

在许多神经科学研究中,医学图像中解剖结构的自动标注非常重要。最近,基于补丁的标注方法得到了广泛研究,以减轻在将图谱注册到目标图像时可能出现的错位问题。然而,用于从注册图谱进行标签融合的权重通常是独立计算的,因此缺乏防止模糊的图谱补丁对标签融合产生影响的能力。更关键的是,这些权重通常仅基于简单的补丁相似度计算,因此不一定能为标签融合提供最优解。为了解决这些局限性,我们提出了一种生成概率模型来描述多图谱场景下的标签融合过程,目标是通过最佳代表性的图谱补丁对目标图像中的每个点进行标注,这些补丁在正确标注基础点时也具有最大的标注一致性。具体而言,对标签融合权重施加稀疏性约束,以选择少量最能代表基础目标补丁的图谱补丁,从而降低包含误导性图谱补丁的风险。通过探索图谱补丁之间的依赖性来实现图谱补丁之间的标注一致性,我们将这些依赖性建模为每对图谱补丁在正确预测标签时的联合概率,通过分析它们的形态学误差模式的相关性以及图谱之间的标注共识来实现。补丁依赖性将根据最新的标注结果进一步递归更新,以纠正可能的标注错误,这属于期望最大化(EM)框架。为了展示标注性能,我们在全脑分割和海马体分割上全面评估了我们基于补丁的标注方法。与传统的基于补丁的标注方法相比,取得了有前景的标注结果,表明该方法在未来临床研究中的潜在应用。