Jones Lee W, Hornsby Whitney E, Freedland Stephen J, Lane Amy, West Miranda J, Moul Judd W, Ferrandino Michael N, Allen Jason D, Kenjale Aarti A, Thomas Samantha M, Herndon James E, Koontz Bridget F, Chan June M, Khouri Michel G, Douglas Pamela S, Eves Neil D
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Eur Urol. 2014 May;65(5):852-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a major adverse effect of radical prostatectomy (RP). We conducted a randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of aerobic training (AT) compared with usual care (UC) on ED prevalence in 50 men (n=25 per group) after RP. AT consisted of five walking sessions per week at 55-100% of peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) for 30-60 min per session following a nonlinear prescription. The primary outcome was change in the prevalence of ED, as measured by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), from baseline to 6 mo. Secondary outcomes were brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), VO2peak, cardiovascular (CV) risk profile (eg, lipid profile, body composition), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The prevalence of ED (IIEF score ≤ 21) decreased by 20% in the AT group and by 24% in the UC group (difference: p=0.406). There were no significant between-group differences in any erectile function subscale (p>0.05). Significant between-group differences were observed for changes in FMD and VO2peak, favoring AT. There were no group differences in other markers of CV risk profile or PROs. In summary, nonlinear AT does not improve ED in men with localized prostate cancer in the acute period following RP.
Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00620932.
勃起功能障碍(ED)是根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的主要不良反应。我们进行了一项随机对照试验,以研究有氧训练(AT)与常规护理(UC)相比,对50名RP术后男性(每组n = 25)ED患病率的影响。AT包括每周进行五次步行训练,按照非线性处方,每次训练30 - 60分钟,运动强度为峰值摄氧量(VO₂peak)的55 - 100%。主要结局指标是通过国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)测量的ED患病率从基线到6个月的变化。次要结局指标包括肱动脉血流介导的血管舒张(FMD)、VO₂peak、心血管(CV)风险概况(如血脂谱、身体成分)以及患者报告结局(PROs)。AT组ED患病率(IIEF评分≤21)下降了20%,UC组下降了24%(差异:p = 0.406)。在任何勃起功能亚量表上,两组之间均无显著差异(p>0.05)。在FMD和VO₂peak的变化方面观察到组间有显著差异,AT组更具优势。在CV风险概况或PROs的其他指标方面,两组之间没有差异。总之,在RP术后急性期,非线性AT并不能改善局限性前列腺癌男性的ED。
Clinicaltrials.gov标识符NCT00620932。