Suppr超能文献

家长和提供者对免疫接种的看法:提供者是否高估了家长的担忧?

Parent and provider perspectives on immunization: are providers overestimating parental concerns?

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Center for Vaccine Awareness and Research, Texas Children's Hospital, 1102 Bates St., Suite 1120, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Center for Vaccine Awareness and Research, Texas Children's Hospital, 1102 Bates St., Suite 1120, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2014 Jan 23;32(5):579-84. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.11.076. Epub 2013 Dec 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Data are limited on whether providers understand parental attitudes to recommended childhood immunizations. We determined parental attitudes and assessed how accurately providers estimated parental opinions.

METHODS

Survey of parents and providers (pediatricians, nurses, medical assistants) in randomly selected practices in Houston, Texas. Surveys assessed demographics, perceptions of immunization importance, safety and efficacy, and acceptability of vaccine delivery. Providers estimated parental responses.

RESULTS

401 parents (82% mothers, 12% fathers, 6% other) and 105 providers participated. Parents thought vaccines were important for health (median score 9.5; 0=not important, 10=extremely important) but also were concerned regarding vaccine safety and side effects (8.9 on 0-10 scale). 309 (77%) agreed that vaccines effectively prevent disease. Route of administration mattered to 147 (37%), who preferred injection (9.0) over oral (7.3) or intranasal (4.8) routes. Although parents would prefer three or fewer injections per visit, preventing more diseases (189 [47.6%]) was more important than number of injections (167 [42.3%]) when deciding the number of vaccines allowed per visit. White parents rated vaccines less important in preventing some illnesses than did non-white (P≤0.006 for meningitis, hepatitis, HPV, influenza and rotavirus) and rated number of injections per visit more important than number of diseases prevented (51.6% white versus 34.2% non-white; P 0.002). Providers underestimated parental attitudes toward vaccine importance (particularly influenza and HPV), and overestimated the proportion of parents who thought route of administration mattered (63%) and that number of injections per visit was the most important factor (76%) around parental vaccine decisions (P<0.001 for parent-provider mismatch).

CONCLUSIONS

Most surveyed parents believe vaccines are important for child health and rate disease prevention higher than number of injections entailed. Providers underestimate the importance of some vaccines to parents and overestimate parental concerns regarding route of administration. Future research should focus on how this mismatch impacts parental vaccine decisions.

摘要

目的

有关提供者是否了解父母对推荐的儿童免疫接种的态度的数据有限。我们确定了父母的态度,并评估了提供者如何准确估计父母的意见。

方法

在德克萨斯州休斯顿的随机选定的实践中对父母和提供者(儿科医生,护士,医疗助理)进行了调查。调查评估了人口统计学,对免疫接种重要性,安全性和功效的看法以及疫苗接种的可接受性。提供者估计了父母的反应。

结果

401 位父母(82%的母亲,12%的父亲,6%的其他)和 105 位提供者参加了调查。父母认为疫苗对健康很重要(中位数评分 9.5;0=不重要,10=极为重要),但也对疫苗的安全性和副作用表示担忧(0-10 分制为 8.9 分)。309 位(77%)父母同意疫苗能有效预防疾病。有 147 位父母(37%)认为给药途径很重要,他们更喜欢注射(9.0)而不是口服(7.3)或鼻内(4.8)途径。尽管父母希望每次就诊时注射次数少于 3 次,但在决定每次就诊时允许接种的疫苗数量时,预防更多疾病(189[47.6%])比注射次数(167[42.3%])更为重要。与非白人父母相比,白人父母认为疫苗在预防某些疾病方面的重要性较低(脑膜炎,肝炎,HPV,流感和轮状病毒的 P≤0.006),并且认为每次就诊的注射次数比预防疾病的数量更为重要(白人父母为 51.6%,而非白人父母为 34.2%;P 0.002)。提供者低估了父母对疫苗重要性的态度(尤其是对流感和 HPV),并且高估了父母认为给药途径重要的比例(63%)以及每次就诊的注射次数是父母疫苗决策中最重要的因素(76%)(父母与提供者之间的差异 P<0.001)。

结论

大多数接受调查的父母认为疫苗对儿童的健康很重要,并且认为预防疾病比需要的注射次数更为重要。提供者低估了某些疫苗对父母的重要性,并且高估了父母对给药途径的关注。未来的研究应重点关注这种不匹配如何影响父母的疫苗接种决定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验