• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Narrow-diameter implants: are they a predictable treatment option? A literature review.窄径种植体:它们是一种可预测的治疗选择吗?文献综述。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014 Jan 1;19(1):e74-81. doi: 10.4317/medoral.19306.
2
Predictability of short implants ( < 10 mm) as a treatment option for the rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae. A systematic review.短种植体(<10毫米)作为萎缩性上颌骨修复治疗选择的可预测性。一项系统评价。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 May 1;21(3):e392-402. doi: 10.4317/medoral.20949.
3
Narrow Diameter Dental Implants as an Alternative Treatment for Atrophic Alveolar Ridges. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.窄径牙种植体作为萎缩性牙槽嵴的替代治疗方法。系统评价与荟萃分析。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jun 11;14(12):3234. doi: 10.3390/ma14123234.
4
Survival rate of titanium-zirconium narrow diameter dental implants versus commercially pure titanium narrow diameter dental implants: A systematic review.钛锆合金窄径种植体与纯钛窄径种植体存活率的比较:系统评价。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Dec;19(6):1015-1022. doi: 10.1111/cid.12527. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
5
Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates.种植体长度和直径对生存率的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:35-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01349.x.
6
How successful are small-diameter implants? A literature review.小直径种植体的成功率如何?文献回顾。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):515-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02410.x. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
7
The influence of implant diameter on its survival: a meta-analysis based on prospective clinical trials.种植体直径对其存留率的影响:一项基于前瞻性临床试验的Meta分析
J Periodontol. 2014 Apr;85(4):569-80. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.130043. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
8
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of narrow- vs. regular-diameter dental implants: a 3-year follow-up. A retrospective study.窄直径与常规直径牙科种植体的临床和影像学评估:一项3年随访的回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Feb;26(2):149-56. doi: 10.1111/clr.12309. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
9
Longevity and marginal bone loss of narrow-diameter implants supporting single crowns: A systematic review.窄径种植体单冠修复的长期效果及边缘骨吸收:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 11;14(11):e0225046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225046. eCollection 2019.
10
The Clinical Performance of Narrow Diameter Implants Versus Regular Diameter Implants: A Meta-Analysis.窄直径种植体与常规直径种植体的临床性能:一项荟萃分析。
J Oral Implantol. 2019 Dec;45(6):503-508. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00025. Epub 2019 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Dimensions of Posterior Implant Restorations Related to Intra-Coronal Cantilever and Occlusal Forces: An In Vitro Study.与冠内悬臂和咬合力相关的后牙种植修复体尺寸:一项体外研究。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024 Oct 19;37(2):577-85. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13343.
2
Clinical challenges of biomechanical performance of narrow-diameter implants in maxillary posterior teeth in aging patients: A finite element analysis.老年患者上颌后牙应用小直径种植体的生物力学性能的临床挑战:有限元分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 25;19(3):e0299816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299816. eCollection 2024.
3
Clinical analysis of the tooth-implant papilla for two narrow-diameter titanium-zirconium implants in the anterior area: prospective controlled clinical study.前牙区两颗窄直径钛锆合金种植体的种植体袖口临床分析:前瞻性对照临床研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 5;24(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04075-2.
4
Influence of implant diameter on implant survival rate and clinical outcomes in the posterior area: a systematic review and meta-analysis.种植体直径对后牙区种植体存活率和临床效果的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 21;23(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02962-8.
5
Implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with severe horizontal bone deficit on mini-implants with two-piece design-retrospective analysis after a mean follow-up of 5 years.种植体-修复体对严重水平骨缺损患者的修复- 5 年平均随访后的回顾性分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Jul 28;7(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00353-8.
6
Descriptive retrospective study analyzing relevant factors related to dental implant failure.分析与牙种植体失败相关的相关因素的描述性回顾性研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Nov 1;24(6):e726-e738. doi: 10.4317/medoral.23082.
7
Immediate provisionalization in the esthetic zone: 1-year interim results from a prospective single-cohort multicenter study evaluating 3.0-mm-diameter tapered implants.即刻临时修复在美学区域:一项前瞻性单队列多中心研究的 1 年中期结果,评估了 3.0 毫米直径的锥形种植体。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jul;22(6):2299-2308. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2329-2. Epub 2018 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Two versus three narrow-diameter implants with locator attachments supporting mandibular overdentures: a two-year prospective study.两颗与三颗带定位附件的窄直径种植体支持下颌覆盖义齿的比较:一项为期两年的前瞻性研究。
Int J Dent. 2012;2012:285684. doi: 10.1155/2012/285684. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
2
Long-term retrospective study of narrow implants for fixed dental prostheses.固定义齿修复中窄种植体的长期回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Aug;24(8):847-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02472.x. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
3
How successful are small-diameter implants? A literature review.小直径种植体的成功率如何?文献回顾。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):515-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02410.x. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
4
Guided bone regeneration around single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone: a case series.美学区单颗牙种植体周围引导骨再生:病例系列
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):613-20.
5
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of early loaded narrow diameter implants - 1-year follow-up.早期负载窄直径种植体的临床和影像学评估 - 1 年随访。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):609-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02254.x. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
6
Titanium-zirconium alloy narrow-diameter implants (Straumann Roxolid(®)) for the rehabilitation of horizontally deficient edentulous ridges: prospective study on 18 consecutive patients.瑞锆钛锆合金窄径种植体(士卓曼 Roxolid(®))修复水平向骨量不足的无牙颌:18 例连续患者的前瞻性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23(10):1136-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02296.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
7
A pilot study to evaluate the success and survival rate of titanium-zirconium implants in partially edentulous patients: results after 24 months of follow-up.一项评估部分无牙颌患者钛锆种植体成功率和存活率的初步研究:24 个月随访后的结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jul;23(7):873-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02231.x. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
8
Immediately restored one-piece single-tooth implants with reduced diameter: one-year results of a multi-center study.即刻修复减小直径的一体式单颗种植体:一项多中心研究的一年结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jan;23(1):49-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02174.x. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
9
A double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Titanium-13Zirconium versus Titanium Grade IV small-diameter bone level implants in edentulous mandibles--results from a 1-year observation period.一项关于13锆钛与四级钛小直径骨水平种植体用于无牙下颌骨的双盲随机对照试验(RCT)——1年观察期的结果
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):896-904. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00324.x. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
10
Retrospective multicenter analysis of immediate provisionalization using one-piece narrow-diameter (3.0-mm) implants.单根窄径(3.0 毫米)种植体即刻临时修复的回顾性多中心分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jan-Feb;26(1):163-8.

窄径种植体:它们是一种可预测的治疗选择吗?文献综述。

Narrow-diameter implants: are they a predictable treatment option? A literature review.

机构信息

Clínica Universitaria Odontológica, Universidad Europea de Valencia, C/ Alfambra, 4 - bajo, 46009 - Valencia, Spain,

出版信息

Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014 Jan 1;19(1):e74-81. doi: 10.4317/medoral.19306.

DOI:10.4317/medoral.19306
PMID:24316701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3909436/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the predictability of narrow-diameter implants as a treatment option in routine clinical practice. A literature review was performed of studies reporting clinical results obtained with these implants. Survival rates, peri-implant bone loss and related complications were evaluated. The working hypothesis was that narrow-diameter implants offer clinical results similar to those obtained with implants of greater diameter.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A Medline-PubMed search covering the period between 2002 and 2012 was carried out. Studies published in English and with a follow-up period of at least 12 months were considered for inclusion. A manual search was also conducted in different journals with an important impact factor. results: Twenty-one studies meeting the screening criteria were included in the literature review. A total of 2980 narrow-diameter implants placed in 1607 patients were analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained from the literature indicate that narrow-diameter implants are a predictable treatment option, since they afford clinical results comparable to those obtained with implants of greater diameter.

摘要

目的

评估在常规临床实践中使用小直径种植体作为治疗选择的可预测性。对报告使用这些种植体获得的临床结果的研究进行了文献回顾。评估了存活率、种植体周围骨丢失和相关并发症。工作假说为小直径种植体提供的临床结果与更大直径种植体获得的结果相似。

材料与方法

对 2002 年至 2012 年期间的 Medline-PubMed 进行了检索。考虑纳入发表在英语期刊上且随访时间至少 12 个月的研究。还在具有重要影响因素的不同期刊上进行了手动检索。结果:符合筛选标准的 21 项研究被纳入文献综述。共分析了 1607 名患者的 2980 个小直径种植体。

结论

文献结果表明,小直径种植体是一种可预测的治疗选择,因为它们提供的临床结果与更大直径种植体获得的结果相当。