Doggrell Sheila A, Kairuz Therése
Faculty of Health, Gardens Point, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia,
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Feb;36(1):30-5. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9894-5. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
Resources to help the older aged (≥65 year olds) manage their medicines should probably target those in greatest need. The older-aged have many different types of living circumstances. There are different locations (urban, rural), different types of housing (in the community or in retirement villages), different living arrangements (living alone or with others), and different socioeconomic status (SES) circumstances. However, there has been limited attention to whether these living circumstances affect adherence to medicines in the ≥65 year olds.
The aim was to determine whether comparative studies, including logistic regression studies, show that living circumstances affect adherence to medicines by the ≥65 year olds.
A literature search of Medline, CINAHL and the Internet (Google) was undertaken.
Four comparative studies have not shown differences in adherence to medicines between the ≥65 year olds living in rural and urban locations, but one study shows lower adherence to medicines for osteoporosis in rural areas compared to metropolitan, and another study shows greater adherence to antihypertensive medicines in rural than urban areas. There are no comparative studies of adherence to medicines in the older-aged living in indigenous communities compared to other communities. There is conflicting evidence as to whether living alone, being unmarried, or having a low income/worth is associated with nonadherence. Preliminary studies have suggested that the older-aged living in rental, low SES retirement villages or leasehold, middle SES retirement villages have a lower adherence to medicines than those living in freehold, high SES retirement villages.
The ≥65 year olds living in rural communities may need extra help with adherence to medicines for osteoporosis. The ≥65 year olds living in rental or leasehold retirement villages may require extra assistance/resources to adhere to their medicines. Further research is needed to clarify whether living under certain living circumstances (e.g. living alone, being unmarried, low income) has an effect on adherence, and to determine whether the ≥65 year olds living in indigenous communities need assistance to be adherent to prescribed medicines.
帮助老年人(≥65岁)管理药物的资源或许应针对最有需求的人群。老年人有多种不同的生活状况。存在不同的地点(城市、农村)、不同类型的住房(社区或退休村)、不同的生活安排(独居或与他人同住)以及不同的社会经济地位(SES)情况。然而,这些生活状况是否会影响65岁及以上老年人的用药依从性,受到的关注有限。
目的是确定包括逻辑回归研究在内的比较研究是否表明生活状况会影响65岁及以上老年人的用药依从性。
对医学期刊数据库(Medline)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)以及互联网(谷歌)进行文献检索。
四项比较研究未显示65岁及以上城乡居住者在用药依从性上存在差异,但有一项研究表明,农村地区骨质疏松症用药的依从性低于大都市地区,另一项研究则显示农村地区抗高血压药物的依从性高于城市地区。与其他社区相比,针对居住在原住民社区的老年人用药依从性的比较研究尚无。关于独居、未婚或低收入/低财富状况是否与不依从相关,证据相互矛盾。初步研究表明,居住在租赁型、低SES退休村或租赁型、中等SES退休村的老年人用药依从性低于居住在自有型、高SES退休村的老年人。
居住在农村社区的65岁及以上老年人在骨质疏松症用药依从性方面可能需要额外帮助。居住在租赁型或租赁产权退休村的65岁及以上老年人可能需要额外的帮助/资源来坚持用药。需要进一步研究以阐明在某些生活状况下(如独居、未婚、低收入)生活是否会影响依从性,并确定居住在原住民社区的65岁及以上老年人在遵医嘱用药方面是否需要帮助。