Suppr超能文献

氦氧混合气用于儿童哮吼

Heliox for croup in children.

作者信息

Moraa Irene, Sturman Nancy, McGuire Treasure, van Driel Mieke L

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Australia Centre of Excellence, 20 Cornwall Street, Woolloongabba, Australia.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 7(12):CD006822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006822.pub4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Croup is thought to be triggered by a viral infection and is characterised by respiratory distress due to upper airway inflammation and swelling of the subglottic mucosa in children. Mostly it is mild and transient and resolves with supportive care. In moderate to severe cases, treatment with corticosteroids and nebulised epinephrine (adrenaline) is required. Corticosteroids improve symptoms but it takes time for a full effect to be achieved. In the interim, the child is at risk of further deterioration. This may rarely result in respiratory failure necessitating emergency intubation and ventilation. Nebulised epinephrine may result in dose-related adverse effects including tachycardia, arrhythmias and hypertension and its benefit may be short-lived. Helium-oxygen (heliox) inhalation has shown therapeutic benefit in initial treatment of acute respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis and may prevent morbidity and mortality in ventilated neonates. Heliox has been used during emergency transport of children with severe croup and anecdotal evidence suggests that heliox relieves respiratory distress.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effect of heliox on relieving symptoms and signs of croup, as determined by a croup score (a tool for measuring the severity of croup).To examine the effect of croup on rates of admission or intubation (or both), through comparisons of heliox with placebo or any active intervention(s) in children with croup.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL 2013, Issue 10, MEDLINE (1950 to October week 5, 2013), EMBASE (1974 to November 2013), CINAHL (1982 to November 2013), Web of Science (1955 to November 2013) and LILACS (1982 to November 2013). In addition, we searched two clinical trials registries: the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) and clinicaltrials.gov (searched 12 November 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing the effect of helium-oxygen mixtures with placebo or any active intervention(s) in children with croup.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently identified and assessed citations for inclusion. A third review author resolved disagreements. We assessed included trials for allocation concealment, blinding of intervention, completeness of outcome data, selective outcome reporting and other potential sources of bias. We reported mean differences for continuous data and odds ratios for dichotomous data. We descriptively reported data not suitable for statistical analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three RCTs with a total of 91 participants. One study compared heliox 70%/30% with 30% humidified oxygen administered for 20 minutes in children with mild croup and found no statistically significant differences in the overall change in croup scores between heliox and the comparator. In another study, children with moderate to severe croup were administered intramuscular dexamethasone 0.6 mg/kg and either heliox 70%/30% with one to two doses of nebulised saline, or 100% oxygen with one to two doses of nebulised racaemic epinephrine for three hours. In this study, the heliox group's croup scores improved significantly more at all time points from 90 minutes onwards. However, overall there were no significant differences in croup scores between the groups after four hours using repeated measures analysis. In a third study, children with moderate croup all received one dose of oral dexamethasone 0.3 mg/kg with heliox 70%/30% for 60 minutes in the intervention group and no treatment in the comparator. There was a statistically significant difference in croup scores at 60 minutes in favour of heliox but no significant difference after 120 minutes. It was not possible to pool outcomes because the included studies compared different interventions and reported different outcomes. No adverse events were reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence to suggest a short-term benefit of heliox inhalation in children with moderate to severe croup who have been administered oral or intramuscular dexamethasone. In one study, the benefit appeared to be similar to a combination of 100% oxygen with nebulised epinephrine. In another study there was a slight change in croup scores between heliox and controls, with unclear clinical significance. In another study in mild croup, the benefit of humidified heliox was equivalent to that of 30% humidified oxygen, suggesting that heliox is not indicated in this group of patients provided that 30% oxygen is available. Adequately powered RCTs comparing heliox with standard treatments are needed to further assess the role of heliox in children with moderate to severe croup.

摘要

背景

哮吼被认为是由病毒感染引发的,其特征为儿童因上呼吸道炎症和声门下黏膜肿胀而出现呼吸窘迫。多数情况下病情较轻且呈自限性,通过支持治疗即可缓解。在中重度病例中,则需要使用皮质类固醇和雾化肾上腺素进行治疗。皮质类固醇可改善症状,但要完全起效需要一定时间。在此期间,患儿有进一步恶化的风险,极少数情况下可能导致呼吸衰竭,需要紧急插管和通气。雾化肾上腺素可能会导致与剂量相关的不良反应,包括心动过速、心律失常和高血压,且其疗效可能是短暂的。氦氧混合气吸入已显示出对急性呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)细支气管炎初始治疗具有治疗益处,并可能预防机械通气新生儿的发病和死亡。氦氧混合气已用于重度哮吼患儿的紧急转运,有轶事证据表明氦氧混合气可缓解呼吸窘迫。

目的

通过哮吼评分(一种用于衡量哮吼严重程度的工具)来检验氦氧混合气对缓解哮吼症状和体征的效果。通过比较氦氧混合气与安慰剂或其他任何积极干预措施对哮吼患儿的影响,来检验氦氧混合气对入院率或插管率(或两者)的影响。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库2013年第10期、医学索引数据库(1950年至2013年10月第5周)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(1974年至2013年11月)、护理学与健康领域数据库(1982年至2013年11月)、科学引文索引数据库(1955年至2013年11月)以及拉丁美洲和加勒比地区卫生科学数据库(1982年至2013年11月)。此外,我们还检索了两个临床试验注册库:世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(WHO ICTRP)和美国国立医学图书馆临床试验数据库(检索时间为2013年11月12日)。

入选标准

比较氦氧混合气与安慰剂或其他任何积极干预措施对哮吼患儿影响的随机对照试验(RCT)和半随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立识别并评估纳入文献。第三位综述作者解决分歧。我们评估纳入试验的分配隐藏、干预措施的盲法、结局数据的完整性、选择性报告结局以及其他潜在的偏倚来源。我们报告连续数据的均值差和二分数据的比值比。我们对不适合进行统计分析的数据进行描述性报告。

主要结果

我们纳入了3项RCT,共91名参与者。一项研究比较了70%/30%氦氧混合气与30%湿化氧气对轻度哮吼患儿进行20分钟治疗的效果,发现氦氧混合气组与对照组在哮吼评分的总体变化上无统计学显著差异。在另一项研究中,对中重度哮吼患儿给予0.6 mg/kg肌肉注射地塞米松,同时给予70%/30%氦氧混合气加1 - 2剂雾化生理盐水,或100%氧气加1 - 2剂雾化消旋肾上腺素,治疗3小时。在该研究中,从90分钟起,氦氧混合气组在所有时间点的哮吼评分改善均更为显著。然而,使用重复测量分析,4小时后两组在哮吼评分上总体无显著差异。在第三项研究中,中度哮吼患儿在干预组接受1剂0.3 mg/kg口服地塞米松加70%/30%氦氧混合气治疗60分钟,对照组不进行治疗。干预组在60分钟时哮吼评分有统计学显著差异,支持氦氧混合气组,但120分钟后无显著差异。由于纳入研究比较的干预措施不同且报告的结局不同,因此无法合并结果。未报告不良事件。

作者结论

有一些证据表明,对于已接受口服或肌肉注射地塞米松的中重度哮吼患儿,吸入氦氧混合气有短期益处。在一项研究中,其益处似乎与100%氧气加雾化肾上腺素的联合治疗相似。在另一项研究中,氦氧混合气组与对照组在哮吼评分上有轻微变化,临床意义不明确。在另一项针对轻度哮吼的研究中,湿化氦氧混合气的益处与30%湿化氧气相当,这表明在有30%氧气可用的情况下,该组患者无需使用氦氧混合气。需要开展足够样本量的RCT,将氦氧混合气与标准治疗进行比较,以进一步评估氦氧混合气在中重度哮吼患儿中的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验