• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨髓增生异常综合征的预后模型

Prognostic models in myelodysplastic syndromes.

作者信息

Bejar Rafael

机构信息

1Moores Cancer Center, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.

出版信息

Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2013;2013:504-10. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2013.1.504.

DOI:10.1182/asheducation-2013.1.504
PMID:24319225
Abstract

Establishing the prognosis for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is a key element of their care. It helps patients understand the severity of their disease and set expectations for their future. For physicians, an accurate estimate of prognosis drives decisions about the timing and choice of therapeutic options to consider. The International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) has been the standard tool for MDS risk stratification since it was released in 1997. It has been used to describe patients in pivotal clinical trials and is a key element of practice guidelines. Subsequent changes to the classification scheme for MDS and an underestimation of risk in some patients from the low and intermediate-1 categories have led to the development of several newer prognostic models. The most recent is the revised IPSS (IPSS-R), which addresses several of the perceived deficiencies of its predecessor. Despite their utility, none of the available prognostic systems incorporates disease-related molecular abnormalities such as somatic mutations. These lesions are present in the nearly all cases and many have been shown to improve upon existing prognostic models. However, the interpretation of somatic mutations can be challenging and it is not yet clear how best to combine them with clinical predictors of outcome. Here I review several prognostic scoring systems developed after the IPSS and describe the emerging use of molecular markers to refine risk stratification in the MDS patient population.

摘要

确定骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者的预后是其治疗的关键环节。这有助于患者了解自身疾病的严重程度,并对未来形成预期。对于医生而言,准确的预后评估能推动关于治疗方案时机和选择的决策。自1997年发布以来,国际预后评分系统(IPSS)一直是MDS风险分层的标准工具。它被用于关键临床试验中描述患者情况,也是实践指南的关键要素。MDS分类方案随后的变化以及低危和中危-1组部分患者风险的低估促使了几种更新的预后模型的开发。最新的是修订后的IPSS(IPSS-R),它解决了其前身存在的一些明显缺陷。尽管这些系统有用,但现有的预后系统均未纳入与疾病相关的分子异常,如体细胞突变。这些病变几乎在所有病例中都存在,并且许多已被证明能改进现有的预后模型。然而,体细胞突变的解读可能具有挑战性,目前尚不清楚如何最好地将它们与临床预后预测指标相结合。在此,我回顾了IPSS之后开发的几种预后评分系统,并描述了分子标志物在MDS患者群体中用于优化风险分层的新用途。

相似文献

1
Prognostic models in myelodysplastic syndromes.骨髓增生异常综合征的预后模型
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2013;2013:504-10. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2013.1.504.
2
Improved risk stratification by the integration of the revised international prognostic scoring system with the myelodysplastic syndromes comorbidity index.改良的国际预后评分系统与骨髓增生异常综合征合并症指数的整合提高了风险分层。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Dec;50(18):3198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.09.016. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
3
Prognostic relevance of morphological classification models for myelodysplastic syndromes in an era of the revised International Prognostic Scoring System.在修订的国际预后评分系统时代,骨髓增生异常综合征形态学分类模型的预后相关性。
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Mar;56:10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.12.004. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
4
Molecular Data and the IPSS-R: How Mutational Burden Can Affect Prognostication in MDS.分子数据与国际预后评分系统修订版(IPSS-R):突变负荷如何影响骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)的预后评估
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2017 Oct;12(5):461-467. doi: 10.1007/s11899-017-0407-9.
5
High flow cytometric scores identify adverse prognostic subgroups within the revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes.高流式细胞术评分可在骨髓增生异常综合征修订国际预后评分系统中识别不良预后亚组。
Br J Haematol. 2014 Oct;167(1):100-9. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12994. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
6
Dichotomization of the new revised international prognostic scoring system for a better clinical stratification of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.新修订的国际预后评分系统的二分法可更好地对骨髓增生异常综合征患者进行临床分层。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 Jun;60(6):1522-1527. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2018.1542151. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
7
Prognostic factors and risk models in myelodysplastic syndromes.骨髓增生异常综合征的预后因素和风险模型。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2013 Sep;13 Suppl 2:S295-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2013.05.022.
8
Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes.骨髓增生异常综合征的分子国际预后评分系统
NEJM Evid. 2022 Jul;1(7):EVIDoa2200008. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2200008. Epub 2022 Jun 12.
9
Validation of the revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a report from the prospective European LeukaemiaNet MDS (EUMDS) registry.修订后的国际预后评分系统(IPSS-R)在低危骨髓增生异常综合征患者中的验证:来自欧洲白血病网骨髓增生异常综合征(EUMDS)前瞻性注册研究的报告
Br J Haematol. 2015 Aug;170(3):372-83. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13450. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
10
[Molecular international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes].[骨髓增生异常综合征的分子国际预后评分系统]
Rinsho Ketsueki. 2023;64(5):355-368. doi: 10.11406/rinketsu.64.355.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel THPO variant in hereditary thrombocytopenia: A potential candidate variant for predisposition to myeloid neoplasm.遗传性血小板减少症中的新型 THPO 变异体:一种潜在的髓系肿瘤易感性候选变异体。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 19;17(12):e0271624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271624. eCollection 2022.
2
Myelodysplastic syndrome with genetic predisposition.伴有遗传易感性的骨髓增生异常综合征
Blood Res. 2021 Apr 30;56(S1):S34-S38. doi: 10.5045/br.2021.2020327.
3
[Myelodysplastic syndromes: recent advances in prognostic risk stratification systems].
[骨髓增生异常综合征:预后风险分层系统的最新进展]
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Mar 14;40(3):252-255. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2019.03.019.
4
Molecular Data and the IPSS-R: How Mutational Burden Can Affect Prognostication in MDS.分子数据与国际预后评分系统修订版(IPSS-R):突变负荷如何影响骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)的预后评估
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2017 Oct;12(5):461-467. doi: 10.1007/s11899-017-0407-9.
5
Validation of the revised International Prognostic Scoring System in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome in Japan: results from a prospective multicenter registry.修订后的国际预后评分系统在日本骨髓增生异常综合征患者中的验证:一项前瞻性多中心注册研究结果
Int J Hematol. 2017 Sep;106(3):375-384. doi: 10.1007/s12185-017-2250-0. Epub 2017 May 11.
6
Large-scale gene network analysis reveals the significance of extracellular matrix pathway and homeobox genes in acute myeloid leukemia: an introduction to the Pigengene package and its applications.大规模基因网络分析揭示细胞外基质途径和同源盒基因在急性髓系白血病中的意义:Pigengene软件包介绍及其应用
BMC Med Genomics. 2017 Mar 16;10(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12920-017-0253-6.
7
Molecular Testing in Myelodysplastic Syndromes for the Practicing Oncologist: Will the Progress Fulfill the Promise?血液系统恶性肿瘤中分子检测对肿瘤专科医生的意义:进展能否兑现承诺?
Oncologist. 2015 Sep;20(9):1069-76. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0067. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
8
Differences in community and academic practice patterns for newly diagnosed myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients.新诊断的骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者在社区和学术实践模式上的差异。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;39(2):222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
9
Genetic predisposition syndromes: when should they be considered in the work-up of MDS?遗传易感性综合征:在骨髓增生异常综合征的检查中何时应考虑它们?
Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2015 Mar;28(1):55-68. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
10
Pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes: an overview of molecular and non-molecular aspects of the disease.骨髓增生异常综合征的发病机制:疾病分子和非分子方面的概述
Blood Res. 2014 Dec;49(4):216-27. doi: 10.5045/br.2014.49.4.216. Epub 2014 Dec 23.