Jackson Tate H, Clark Kait, Mitroff Stephen R
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Vis cogn. 2013;21(7). doi: 10.1080/13506285.2013.832450.
Assessing facial symmetry is an evolutionarily important process, which suggests that individual differences in this ability should exist. As existing data are inconclusive, the current study explored whether a group trained in facial symmetry assessment, orthodontists, possessed enhanced abilities. Symmetry assessment was measured using face and non-face stimuli among orthodontic residents and two control groups: university participants with no symmetry training and airport security luggage screeners, a group previously shown to possess expert visual search skills unrelated to facial symmetry. Orthodontic residents were more accurate at assessing symmetry in both upright and inverted faces compared to both control groups, but not for non-face stimuli. These differences are not likely due to motivational biases or a speed-accuracy tradeoff-orthodontic residents were slower than the university participants but not the security screeners. Understanding such individual differences in facial symmetry assessment may inform the perception of facial attractiveness.
评估面部对称性是一个在进化上很重要的过程,这表明在这种能力上应该存在个体差异。由于现有数据尚无定论,当前的研究探讨了接受过面部对称性评估训练的正畸医生群体是否具备更强的能力。在正畸住院医师以及两个对照组(未接受对称性训练的大学参与者和机场安检行李检查员,后者是一个先前已证明具备与面部对称性无关的专家级视觉搜索技能的群体)中,使用面部和非面部刺激来测量对称性评估。与两个对照组相比,正畸住院医师在评估正立和倒立面部的对称性时更为准确,但在评估非面部刺激时并非如此。这些差异不太可能是由于动机偏差或速度 - 准确性权衡造成的——正畸住院医师比大学参与者速度慢,但比安检员速度快。了解面部对称性评估中的此类个体差异可能会为对面部吸引力的认知提供信息。