Suppr超能文献

从乳腺钼靶摄影到断层合成:审视二维与分段三维视觉搜索之间的差异。

Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search.

作者信息

Adamo Stephen H, Ericson Justin M, Nah Joseph C, Brem Rachel, Mitroff Stephen R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Department of Radiology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018 Jun 14;3(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41235-018-0103-x. eCollection 2018 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radiological techniques for breast cancer detection are undergoing a massive technological shift-moving from mammography, a process that takes a two-dimensional (2D) image of breast tissue, to tomosynthesis, a technique that creates a segmented-three-dimensional (3D) image. There are distinct benefits of tomosynthesis over mammography with radiologists having fewer false positives and more accurate detections; yet there is a significant and meaningful disadvantage with tomosynthesis in that it takes longer to evaluate each patient. This added time can dramatically impact workflow and have negative attentional and cognitive impacts on interpretation of medical images. To better understand the nature of segmented-3D visual search and the implications for radiology, the current study looked to establish a new testing platform that could reliably examine differences between 2D and segmented-3D search.

RESULTS

In Experiment 1, both professionals (radiology residents and certified radiologists) and non-professionals (undergraduate students) were found to have fewer false positives and were more accurate in segmented-3D displays, but at the cost of taking significantly longer in search. Experiment 2 tested a second group of non-professional participants, using a background that more closely resembled a mammogram, and replicated the results of Experiment 1-search was more accurate and there were fewer false alarms in segmented 3D displays but took more time.

CONCLUSION

The results of Experiments 1 and 2 matched the performance patterns found in previous radiology studies and in the clinic, suggesting this novel experimental paradigm potentially provides a flexible and cost-effective tool that can be utilized with non-professional populations to inform relevant visual search performance. From an academic perspective, this paradigm holds promise for examining the nature of segmented-3D visual search.

摘要

背景

用于乳腺癌检测的放射技术正在经历巨大的技术变革——从获取乳腺组织二维(2D)图像的乳房X线摄影术,转向生成分段三维(3D)图像的断层合成技术。断层合成技术相对于乳房X线摄影术具有明显优势,放射科医生的假阳性更少,检测更准确;然而,断层合成技术也有一个重大且显著的缺点,即评估每位患者所需时间更长。这段额外的时间会极大地影响工作流程,并对医学图像解读产生负面的注意力和认知影响。为了更好地理解分段3D视觉搜索的本质及其对放射学的影响,本研究旨在建立一个新的测试平台,该平台能够可靠地检测2D搜索和分段3D搜索之间的差异。

结果

在实验1中,专业人员(放射科住院医师和认证放射科医生)和非专业人员(本科生)在分段3D显示中均有较少的假阳性,且检测更准确,但代价是搜索时间显著延长。实验2测试了另一组非专业参与者,使用了更接近乳房X线照片的背景,并重复了实验1的结果——在分段3D显示中搜索更准确,误报更少,但花费时间更多。

结论

实验1和实验2的结果与先前放射学研究及临床中发现的性能模式相符,这表明这种新颖的实验范式可能提供了一种灵活且经济高效的工具,可用于非专业人群,以了解相关的视觉搜索性能。从学术角度来看,这种范式有望用于研究分段3D视觉搜索的本质。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6350/6091390/c2c4e4ea1d63/41235_2018_103_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验