Panegyres Peter K, Chen Huei-Yang
Neurodegenerative Disorders Research Pty Ltd 185 York Street, Subiaco, Perth, Western Australia 6008.
Am J Neurodegener Dis. 2013 Nov 29;2(4):300-6. eCollection 2013.
Previous studies comparing early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late-onset AD (LOAD) have been limited by cross-sectional design and a focus on isolated clinical variables. This study aims to explore differentials in clinical features between EOAD and LOAD and to examine longitudinally trends in cognitive function. Data from 3,747 subjects with AD from C-Path Online Data Repository was used to compare demographics, body mass index (BMI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), biochemistry and cognitive assessments, including mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog), between EOAD and LOAD. The baseline differences were examined by binominal proportion test and t-test. The trends of cognitive functions, evaluating by MMSE and ADAS-Cog, were examined by the mixed model, controlling for the effect of repeated measures of the same person. No significant difference was found in BMI and MAP. C-reactive protein, creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (p<0.05) were significantly higher in LOAD. The APOE ε4 alleles was more likely to be found among LOAD compared to APOE ε2 or APOE ε3. EOAD had significantly lower MMSE at baseline and this difference significantly increased over time. Despite an insignificant differential in ADAS-Cog between EOAD and LOAD at baseline, the differential was enlarged gradually and became more significant with time. Our findings suggest that elevated inflammatory markers, impaired renal function and APOE ε4 alleles are overrepresented in LOAD, possibly indicating that different factors determine the development of EOAD and its more rapid cognitive deterioration.
以往比较早发性阿尔茨海默病(EOAD)和晚发性阿尔茨海默病(LOAD)的研究受到横断面设计以及对孤立临床变量关注的限制。本研究旨在探讨EOAD和LOAD临床特征的差异,并纵向考察认知功能的变化趋势。使用来自C-Path在线数据存储库的3747例AD患者的数据,比较EOAD和LOAD在人口统计学、体重指数(BMI)、平均动脉压(MAP)、生物化学以及认知评估(包括简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表(ADAS-Cog))方面的差异。通过二项比例检验和t检验来检验基线差异。通过混合模型考察由MMSE和ADAS-Cog评估的认知功能变化趋势,同时控制同一人重复测量的影响。未发现BMI和MAP有显著差异。LOAD患者的C反应蛋白、肌酐和血尿素氮(BUN)(p<0.05)显著更高。与APOE ε2或APOE ε3相比,LOAD患者中更易发现APOE ε4等位基因。EOAD患者基线时的MMSE显著更低,且这种差异随时间显著增大。尽管EOAD和LOAD在基线时ADAS-Cog的差异不显著,但该差异随时间逐渐扩大并变得更加显著。我们的研究结果表明,炎症标志物升高、肾功能受损和APOE ε4等位基因在LOAD中更为常见,这可能表明不同因素决定了EOAD的发生及其更快的认知衰退。