Weltings Emma, Postema Merel C, van Dam Maureen, Dubbelman Mark A, Tewolde Mukrabe E, Duits Flora H, Lemstra Afina W, Dickerson Bradford C, Carrillo Maria C, Rabinovici Gil D, Hammers Dustin B, Van der Flier Wiesje M, Apostolova Liana G, Pijnenburg Yolande A L, Sikkes Sietske A M
Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Sep;21(9):e70711. doi: 10.1002/alz.70711.
The aim of this study was to examine differences in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) among young-onset dementia (YOD) diagnoses.
Participants were included from Amsterdam Dementia and Longitudinal Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease (LEADS) cohorts, with diagnoses of typical Alzheimer's disease (AD), behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), primary progressive aphasia (PPA), posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), or dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) established in multidisciplinary meetings. We compared overall IADL scores and item level scores between groups using multiple regression analyses, adjusted for cohort, demographics, and disease severity.
We included 582 YOD patients (58.4 ± 4.2 years; 59%F), with overall moderate IADL problems (47.5 ± 8.57). DLB patients showed the most IADL difficulties (41.8 ± 7.8) compared to PCA, typical AD, bvFTD, and PPA (adjusted β range 4.62 to 14.14, all p < 0.01), whereas PPA patients showed the least IADL difficulties (55.8 ± 9.83), with item-specific differences.
We found differences in everyday functioning between YOD types. Understanding IADL in YOD types will assist in care planning.
Patients with DLB showed the most IADL difficulties compared to PCA, typical AD, bvFTD, and PPA Patients with PPA showed the least IADL difficulties compared to DLB, PCA, typical AD, and bvFTD We identified diagnostic group-specific activity challenges. While 'working' was among the most commonly impaired activities across al groups, distinct functional challenges emerged per diagnosis: for example, DLB had high impairment in financial tasks, PCA patients in visual-spatial tasks, and bvFTD with planning and organizational activities (e.g. making appointments).
本研究旨在探讨早发型痴呆(YOD)各诊断类型在工具性日常生活活动(IADL)方面的差异。
研究对象来自阿姆斯特丹痴呆与纵向早发型阿尔茨海默病(LEADS)队列,这些患者在多学科会议中被确诊为典型阿尔茨海默病(AD)、行为变异型额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)、原发性进行性失语(PPA)、后皮质萎缩(PCA)或路易体痴呆(DLB)。我们使用多元回归分析比较了各组之间的总体IADL得分和项目水平得分,并对队列、人口统计学和疾病严重程度进行了调整。
我们纳入了582例早发型痴呆患者(年龄58.4±4.2岁;59%为女性),总体存在中度IADL问题(47.5±8.57)。与PCA、典型AD、bvFTD和PPA相比,DLB患者的IADL困难最为严重(41.8±7.8)(调整后的β范围为4.62至14.14,所有p<0.01),而PPA患者的IADL困难最少(55.8±9.83),且存在特定项目的差异。
我们发现早发型痴呆各类型在日常功能方面存在差异。了解早发型痴呆各类型的IADL情况将有助于护理计划的制定。
与PCA、典型AD、bvFTD和PPA相比,DLB患者的IADL困难最为严重;与DLB、PCA、典型AD和bvFTD相比,PPA患者的IADL困难最少;我们确定了各诊断组特定的活动挑战。虽然“工作”是所有组中最常受损的活动之一,但每种诊断都出现了不同的功能挑战:例如,DLB在财务任务方面受损严重,PCA患者在视觉空间任务方面受损严重,bvFTD在计划和组织活动(如预约)方面受损严重。