Ohio University.
Milbank Q. 2013 Dec;91(4):690-728. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12030.
When elderly patients face a terminal illness such as lung cancer, most are unaware that what we term in this article "the Lake Wobegon effect" taints the treatment advice imparted to them by their oncologists. In framing treatment plans, cancer specialists tend to intimate that elderly patients are like the children living in Garrison Keillor's mythical Lake Wobegon: above average and thus likely to exceed expectations. In this article, we use the story of our mother's death from lung cancer to investigate the consequences of elderly people's inability to reconcile the grave reality of their illness with the overly optimistic predictions of their physicians.
In this narrative analysis, we examine the routine treatment of elderly, terminally ill cancer patients through alternating lenses: the lens of a historian of medicine who also teaches ethics to medical students and the lens of an actuary who is able to assess physicians' claims for the outcome of medical treatments.
We recognize that a desire to instill hope in patients shapes physicians' messages. We argue, however, that the automatic optimism conveyed to elderly, dying patients by cancer specialists prompts those patients to choose treatment that is ineffective and debilitating. Rather than primarily prolong life, treatments most notably diminish patients' quality of life, weaken the ability of patients and their families to prepare for their deaths, and contribute significantly to the unsustainable costs of the U.S. health care system.
The case described in this article suggests how physicians can better help elderly, terminally ill patients make medical decisions that are less damaging to them and less costly to the health care system.
当老年患者面临肺癌等终末期疾病时,他们中的大多数人并不知道,我们在本文中称之为“沃比冈湖效应”(Lake Wobegon effect)会影响肿瘤医生为他们提供的治疗建议。在制定治疗计划时,癌症专家往往暗示,老年患者就像加里森·凯勒(Garrison Keillor)虚构的沃比冈湖(Lake Wobegon)中生活的孩子们一样:高于平均水平,因此很有可能超出预期。在本文中,我们用母亲死于肺癌的故事来研究老年人无法调和疾病的严峻现实与医生过于乐观的预测这两者之间的关系所带来的后果。
在这项叙述性分析中,我们通过交替使用两种视角来审视老年、终末期癌症患者的常规治疗:一种是医学史学家的视角,他也为医学生教授伦理学;另一种是精算师的视角,后者能够评估医生对医疗效果的预测。
我们认识到,向患者灌输希望的愿望塑造了医生的信息传递方式。然而,我们认为,癌症专家向老年临终患者自动传递的乐观情绪促使这些患者选择了无效且使身体虚弱的治疗方法。这些治疗方法主要不是延长生命,而是显著降低了患者的生活质量,削弱了患者及其家属为死亡做准备的能力,并对美国医疗保健系统的可持续性成本造成了重大影响。
本文所述的案例表明,医生如何能够更好地帮助老年终末期患者做出对他们自身和医疗保健系统损害较小的医疗决策。