Smith Thomas J, Dow Lindsay A, Virago Enid A, Khatcheressian James, Matsuyama Robin, Lyckholm Laurel J
Massey Cancer Center of Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Education, VCU School of Medicine, Department of Social and Behavioral Health, and the Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0230, USA.
J Support Oncol. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.suponc.2010.12.005.
Most cancer patients do not have an explicit discussion about prognosis and treatment despite documented adverse outcomes. Few decision aids have been developed to assist the difficult discussions of palliative management. We developed decision aids for people with advanced in curable breast, colorectal, lung, and hormone-refractory prostate cancers facing first-, second-, third-, and fourth-line chemotherapy. We recruited patients from our urban oncology clinic after gaining the permission of their treating oncologist. We measured knowledge of curability and treatment benefit before and after the intervention. Twenty-six of 27 (96%) patients completed the aids, with ameanage of 63, 56% female, 56% married, 56% African American, and 67% with a high school education or more. Most patients (14/27, 52%) thought a person with their advanced cancer could be cured, which was reduced (to 8/26, 31%, P = 0.15) after the decision aid. Nearly all overestimated the effect of palliative chemotherapy. No distress was noted, and hope did not change. The majority (20/27, 74%) found the information helpful to them, and almost all (25/27, 93%) wanted to share the information with their family and physicians. It is possible to give incurable patients their prognosis, treatment options, and options for improving end-of-life care without causing distress or lack of hope. Almost all find the information helpful and want to share it with doctors and family. Research is needed to test the findings in a larger sample and measure the outcomes of truthful information on quality of life, quality of care, and costs.
尽管有记录显示存在不良后果,但大多数癌症患者并未就预后和治疗进行明确讨论。很少有决策辅助工具被开发出来以协助进行有关姑息治疗的艰难讨论。我们为患有无法治愈的晚期乳腺癌、结直肠癌、肺癌和激素难治性前列腺癌且面临一线、二线、三线和四线化疗的患者开发了决策辅助工具。在获得其主治肿瘤学家的许可后,我们从城市肿瘤诊所招募了患者。我们在干预前后测量了患者对治愈率和治疗益处的了解情况。27名患者中有26名(96%)完成了辅助工具的使用,平均年龄为63岁,56%为女性,56%已婚,56%为非裔美国人,67%具有高中及以上学历。大多数患者(14/27,52%)认为患有他们这种晚期癌症的人可以治愈,在使用决策辅助工具后这一比例有所下降(降至8/26,31%,P = 0.15)。几乎所有人都高估了姑息化疗的效果。未发现有痛苦情绪,希望也没有改变。大多数人(20/27,74%)认为这些信息对他们有帮助,几乎所有人(25/27,93%)都想与家人和医生分享这些信息。有可能向无法治愈的患者告知其预后、治疗选择以及改善临终护理的选择,而不会导致痛苦或失去希望。几乎所有人都认为这些信息有帮助,并希望与医生和家人分享。需要进行研究以在更大样本中检验这些发现,并衡量真实信息对生活质量、护理质量和成本的影响。