Lewis James S, Lepak Alex J, Thompson George R, Craig William A, Andes David R, Sabol-Dzintars Kathryn E, Jorgensen James H
Department of Pharmacy, University Health System, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(3):1327-31. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01877-13. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
Inducible clindamycin resistance in beta-hemolytic streptococci remains an underrecognized phenomenon of unknown clinical significance. We performed an evaluation of inducible clindamycin resistance using an animal model as well as retrospectively reviewing the charts of patients treated with clindamycin monotherapy who were infected with beta-hemolytic streptococci inducibly resistant to clindamycin. The neutropenic mouse thigh model of infection was used to evaluate the in vivo activity of clindamycin against beta-hemolytic streptococci, including isolates susceptible, inducibly resistant, or constitutively resistant to clindamycin. The clinical microbiology laboratory information system and pharmacy databases were cross-referenced to identify patients with infections due to inducibly clindamycin-resistant beta-hemolytic streptococci who were treated with clindamycin monotherapy. Medical records of these patients were reviewed to evaluate microbiologic and clinical outcomes. Inducible clindamycin resistance resulted in impaired killing of beta-hemolytic streptococci in the animal model. Though suppressed initially, compared to those with constitutive resistance (P=0.0429), by 48 h, colony counts of inducibly clindamycin-resistant organisms were similar to those of constitutively resistant isolates (P=0.1142). In addition, we identified 8 patients infected with inducibly clindamycin-resistant beta-hemolytic streptococci who experienced clinical and microbiologic failure when treated with clindamycin monotherapy. These patients either improved initially and subsequently failed or never responded to clindamycin therapy. We have demonstrated in a murine model of infection and from human cases that inducible clindamycin resistance in beta-hemolytic streptococci is clinically significant. Routine testing and reporting by clinical laboratories should be encouraged and alternative antimicrobial agents considered when these organisms are encountered in clinical care.
β溶血性链球菌中可诱导的克林霉素耐药性仍然是一种未被充分认识的现象,其临床意义尚不清楚。我们使用动物模型对可诱导的克林霉素耐药性进行了评估,并回顾性分析了接受克林霉素单药治疗且感染了对克林霉素可诱导耐药的β溶血性链球菌患者的病历。采用中性粒细胞减少小鼠大腿感染模型评估克林霉素对β溶血性链球菌的体内活性,包括对克林霉素敏感、可诱导耐药或固有耐药的分离株。交叉参考临床微生物学实验室信息系统和药房数据库,以确定接受克林霉素单药治疗且感染了对克林霉素可诱导耐药的β溶血性链球菌的患者。回顾这些患者的病历以评估微生物学和临床结果。在动物模型中,可诱导的克林霉素耐药性导致β溶血性链球菌的杀灭受损。虽然最初受到抑制,但与固有耐药者相比(P=0.0429),到48小时时,可诱导克林霉素耐药菌的菌落计数与固有耐药分离株相似(P=0.1142)。此外,我们确定了8例感染了对克林霉素可诱导耐药的β溶血性链球菌的患者,他们在接受克林霉素单药治疗时出现了临床和微生物学治疗失败。这些患者要么最初病情改善随后恶化,要么对克林霉素治疗从未有反应。我们在小鼠感染模型和人类病例中均证明,β溶血性链球菌中可诱导的克林霉素耐药性具有临床意义。应鼓励临床实验室进行常规检测和报告,当在临床护理中遇到这些微生物时,应考虑使用替代抗菌药物。