Suppr超能文献

两种金属粘结树脂水门汀与钴铬合金粘结的微拉伸粘结强度的体外比较评价

An in vitro Comparative Evaluation of Micro Tensile Bond Strength of Two metal bonding Resin Cements bonded to Cobalt Chromium alloy.

作者信息

Musani Smita, Musani Iqbal, Dugal Ramandeep, Habbu Nitin, Madanshetty Pallavi, Virani Danish

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, M A Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences & Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Int Oral Health. 2013 Oct;5(5):73-8. Epub 2013 Oct 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the micro tensile bond strength of two metal bonding resin cements to sandblasted cobalt chromium alloy.

MATERIALS & METHODS: Eight, Cobalt chromium alloy blocks of dimensions 10x5x5 mm were cast, finished and polished. One of the faces of each alloy block measuring 5x5mm was sandblasted with 50 μm grit alumina particles. The alloy blocks were then cleaned in an ultrasonic cleaner for 1 min and then air dried with an air stream. The Sandblasted surfaces of the two alloy blocks were bonded together with 2 different metal bonding resin systems (Panavia F Kuraray and DTK Kleber - Bredent). The samples were divided into 2 groups (n=4). Group 1- Two Co-Cr blocks were luted with Panavia cement. Group 2- Two Co-Cr blocks were luted with DTK Kleber-Bredent cement. The bonded samples were cut with a diamond saw to prepare Microtensile bars of approximately 1mm x 1mm x 6mm. Thirty bars from each group were randomly separated into 2 subgroups (n=15) and left for 3hrs (baseline) as per manufacturer's instructions while the other group was aged for 24hrs in 370C water, prior to loading to failure under tension at a cross head speed of 1mm/min. Failure modes were determined by means of stereomicroscopy (sm). Statistical analysis was performed through one way - ANOVA.

RESULTS

Significant variation in micro-tensile bond strength was observed between the two metal bonding resin systems.

CONCLUSION

DTK showed higher mean bond strength values than Panavia F cement both at baseline and after aging. How to cite this article: Musani S, Musani I, Dugal R, Habbu N, Madanshetty P, Virani D. An in vitro Comparative Evaluation of Micro Tensile Bond Strength of Two metal bonding Resin Cements bonded to Cobalt Chromium alloy. J Int Oral Health 2013;5(5):73-8.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估和比较两种金属粘结树脂水门汀与喷砂钴铬合金之间的微拉伸粘结强度。

材料与方法

铸造、精加工并抛光8个尺寸为10×5×5mm的钴铬合金块。每个合金块5×5mm的一个面用50μm粒度的氧化铝颗粒进行喷砂处理。然后将合金块在超声清洗器中清洗1分钟,再用气流吹干。将两个合金块的喷砂表面用2种不同的金属粘结树脂系统(Panavia F Kuraray和DTK Kleber - Bredent)粘结在一起。样本分为2组(n = 4)。第1组 - 两个钴铬块用Panavia水门汀粘结。第2组 - 两个钴铬块用DTK Kleber - Bredent水门汀粘结。将粘结后的样本用金刚石锯切割,制备成尺寸约为1mm×1mm×6mm的微拉伸棒。每组30根棒随机分为2个子组(n = 15),按照制造商的说明放置3小时(基线),而另一组在37℃水中老化24小时,然后以1mm/分钟的十字头速度进行拉伸直至破坏。通过体视显微镜(sm)确定破坏模式。采用单因素方差分析进行统计分析。

结果

观察到两种金属粘结树脂系统之间微拉伸粘结强度存在显著差异。

结论

在基线和老化后,DTK显示出比Panavia F水门汀更高的平均粘结强度值。如何引用本文:Musani S, Musani I, Dugal R, Habbu N, Madanshetty P, Virani D. 两种金属粘结树脂水门汀与钴铬合金粘结的微拉伸粘结强度的体外比较评估。《国际口腔健康杂志》2013;5(5):73 - 8 。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Microtensile bond strength of resin-based composites to Ti-6Al-4V.树脂基复合材料与Ti-6Al-4V的微拉伸粘结强度。
Dent Mater. 2009 May;25(5):655-61. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.11.012. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
6
Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin?为什么剪切粘结测试会拔出牙本质?
J Dent Res. 1997 Jun;76(6):1298-307. doi: 10.1177/00220345970760061001.
7
Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review.
Dent Mater. 1995 Mar;11(2):117-25. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(95)80046-8.
9
Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic.
J Dent Res. 1995 Sep;74(9):1591-6. doi: 10.1177/00220345950740091401.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验