Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2014 Aug;65(3):207-13. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
Mycobacterium xenopi is described with upper lobe cavitation ("fibrocavitary" pattern), whereas the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) is described with bronchiectasis and centrilobular nodules ("nodular bronchiectasis"). We retrospectively described and compared computed tomography (CT) chest manifestations of disease caused by MAC and M xenopi.
We reviewed patients who had either MAC or M xenopi lung disease and who had CTs between January 2002 and December 2003. Clinical data were recorded, and the patterns on chest CTs were categorized as "fibrocavitary," "nodular bronchiectatic," and "unclassified."
There were 74 patients; 50 with MAC and 24 with M xenopi. The patients with MAC were older (mean 69 vs 58 years; P = .007). Patients with M xenopi more often had emphysema (50% vs 20%; P = .02), cavities (46% vs 16%; P = .01), and nodules ≤5 mm (88% vs 58%; P = .02). M xenopi cases more commonly had a fibrocavitary radiologic pattern (33% vs 18%), with no statistically significant difference (P = .24). MAC was more often associated with a nodular bronchiectatic pattern (68% MAC vs 4% M xenopi; P < .0001). Sixty-three percent of patients with M xenopi had a pattern that was predominantly randomly distributed nodules (11/15 [73%]) or consolidation and/or ground-glass opacities (4/15 [27%]).
Compared with MAC, patients with M xenopi infection develop more cavities and more nodules, and they less often have a predominant nodular bronchiectatic pattern. Although a predominantly cavitary pattern appears to be more common with M xenopi, the majority of patients with M xenopi had CT patterns of random nodules or consolidation and/or ground-glass opacities rather than classically described findings.
分枝杆菌 xenopi 被描述为上叶空洞(“纤维空洞”模式),而鸟分枝杆菌复合群(MAC)被描述为支气管扩张和中心性结节(“结节性支气管扩张”)。我们回顾性描述并比较了 MAC 和 M xenopi 引起的疾病的胸部 CT 表现。
我们回顾了 2002 年 1 月至 2003 年 12 月期间患有 MAC 或 M xenopi 肺病且进行 CT 检查的患者。记录临床数据,并将胸部 CT 上的模式分为“纤维空洞型”、“结节性支气管扩张型”和“未分类型”。
共有 74 例患者,其中 50 例为 MAC,24 例为 M xenopi。MAC 患者年龄较大(平均 69 岁 vs 58 岁;P =.007)。M xenopi 患者更常患有肺气肿(50% vs 20%;P =.02)、空洞(46% vs 16%;P =.01)和≤5mm 的结节(88% vs 58%;P =.02)。M xenopi 病例更常见纤维空洞型放射模式(33% vs 18%),但无统计学差异(P =.24)。MAC 更常与结节性支气管扩张型模式相关(68% MAC 与 4% M xenopi;P <.0001)。M xenopi 患者中有 63%的患者的模式主要为随机分布的结节(15 例中有 11 例[73%])或实变和/或磨玻璃密度影(15 例中有 4 例[27%])。
与 MAC 相比,M xenopi 感染患者更易出现空洞和结节,且更常出现非主要结节性支气管扩张型模式。虽然主要空洞型似乎在 M xenopi 中更为常见,但大多数 M xenopi 患者的 CT 模式为随机结节或实变和/或磨玻璃密度影,而不是经典描述的发现。