Berisso Massimo Zoni, Bongiorni Maria Grazia, Curnis Antonio, Calvi Valeria, Catanzariti Domenico, Gaita Fiorenzo, Gulizia Michele Massimo, Inama Giuseppe, Landolina Maurizio E, La Rovere Maria Teresa, Mantovan Roberto, Mascioli Giosuè, Occhetta Eraldo, Padeletti Luigi, Salerno-Uriarte Jorge A, Santini Massimo, Sassone Biagio, Senni Michele, Zecchin Massimo
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2013 Nov;14(11):752-72. doi: 10.1714/1360.15089.
The indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction have rapidly expanded over the last 10 years on the basis of the very satisfying results of the numerous randomized clinical trials that have provided the framework for guidelines. However, the analysis of clinical practice in the real world has highlighted some important criticisms in the complex process of selection-management of those patients candidates for ICD therapy: 1) approximately one fourth of all ICD implantations is not justified by clinical evidence, 2) approximately one half of patients with an indication for ICD therapy do not undergo implantation, 3) the benefits from ICD therapy do not apply uniformly to all patients, 4) the relationship between the lifesaving benefit and the potential for harm of ICD therapy is still scarcely known. The main reason for this clinical scenario can be ascribed to the guideline recommendations that are based only on few standard cut-off criteria and therefore too generic and insufficiently detailed. This does not help cardiologists in their decision-making process, and results in fear, uncertainty, and sometimes emotional choices. The aim of this consensus document is to discuss current guideline recommendations and to provide the Italian cardiologists with the most updated information to optimize the selection of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction who should receive ICD therapy.
在过去10年中,基于众多随机临床试验的令人满意的结果(这些试验为指南提供了框架),植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)治疗用于预防严重左心室功能不全患者心源性猝死的适应证迅速扩大。然而,对现实世界临床实践的分析突出了在ICD治疗候选患者的复杂选择管理过程中的一些重要批评:1)所有ICD植入中约四分之一没有临床证据支持;2)约一半有ICD治疗适应证的患者未接受植入;3)ICD治疗的益处并非均匀适用于所有患者;4)ICD治疗的挽救生命益处与潜在危害之间的关系仍知之甚少。这种临床情况的主要原因可归因于指南建议仅基于少数标准临界值标准,因此过于笼统且不够详细。这无助于心脏病专家的决策过程,导致恐惧、不确定性,有时还会导致情绪化的选择。本共识文件的目的是讨论当前的指南建议,并为意大利心脏病专家提供最新信息,以优化对应接受ICD治疗的严重左心室功能不全患者的选择。