van der Heijden Aafke C, van Erven Lieselot, Schalij Martin J, Borleffs C Jan Willem
Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2014 Jul;12(7):787-9. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2014.908704. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
Implementation of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) treatment in the current clinical guidelines led to a significant increase in patients that may benefit from implantation of an ICD. Currently non-guideline-guided patient selection takes place by physicians whereby patients at higher age are more frequently excluded for ICD implantation. This editorial focuses on ICD treatment in the elderly and aims to clarify whether it is justified to withhold ICD treatment in these patients.
在当前临床指南中实施一级预防植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)治疗,使得可能从ICD植入中获益的患者数量显著增加。目前,非指南指导下的患者选择由医生进行,在此过程中,年龄较大的患者更常被排除在ICD植入之外。本社论聚焦于老年患者的ICD治疗,旨在阐明对这些患者不进行ICD治疗是否合理。