Speroni Elisabetta, Poggi Susanna, Vinaccia Vincenza
Recenti Prog Med. 2013 Oct;104(10):535-41. doi: 10.1701/1349.14999.
The physician's need for medical information updates has been studied extensively in recent years but the point of view of the pharmaceutical industry on this need has rarely been considered. This paper reports the results of a retrospective analysis of the medical information service provided to Italian physicians by an important pharmaceutical company, Novartis Pharma, from 2004 to 2012. The results confirm clinicians' appreciation of a service that gives them access to tailored scientific documentation and the number of requests made to the network of medical representatives has been rising steadily, peaking whenever new drugs become available to physicians. The analysis confirms what -other international studies have ascertained, that most queries are about how to use the drugs and what their properties are. The results highlight some differences between different medical specialties: for example, proportionally, neurologists seem to be the most curious. This, as well as other interesting snippets, is worth further exploration. Despite its limits in terms of representativeness, what comes out of the study is the existence of an real unmet need for information by healthcare institutions and that the support offered by the pharmaceutical industry could be invaluable; its role could go well beyond that of a mere supplier to National Healthcare Systems, to that of being recognised as an active partner the process of ensuring balanced and evidence-based information. At the same time, closer appraisal of clinicians' needs could help the pharma industries to improve their communication and educational strategies in presenting their latest clinical research and their own products.
近年来,医生对医学信息更新的需求已得到广泛研究,但制药行业对这一需求的观点却很少被考虑。本文报告了对一家重要制药公司诺华制药在2004年至2012年期间为意大利医生提供的医学信息服务进行回顾性分析的结果。结果证实了临床医生对一项能让他们获取量身定制的科学文献的服务的认可,向医学代表网络提出的请求数量一直在稳步上升,每当有新药可供医生使用时就会达到峰值。该分析证实了其他国际研究已经确定的情况,即大多数问题是关于如何使用药物以及药物的特性是什么。结果突出了不同医学专科之间的一些差异:例如,按比例计算,神经科医生似乎是最具好奇心的。这以及其他有趣的细节值得进一步探讨。尽管该研究在代表性方面存在局限性,但研究结果表明医疗机构确实存在未得到满足的信息需求,并且制药行业提供的支持可能非常宝贵;其作用可能远远超出仅仅作为国家医疗保健系统的供应商,而成为确保信息平衡和基于证据的过程中被认可的积极合作伙伴。与此同时,更深入地评估临床医生的需求有助于制药行业改进其在展示最新临床研究和自身产品方面的沟通和教育策略。