Mark L. Hatzenbuehler is with the Department of Sociomedical Sciences and Peter Muennig is with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Anna Bellatorre is with the Department of Sociology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):332-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301678. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
We determined whether individuals who harbor antigay prejudice experience elevated mortality risk.
Data on heterosexual sexual orientation (n = 20,226, aged 18-89 years), antigay attitudes, and mortality risk factors came from the General Social Survey, which was linked to mortality data from the National Death Index (1988-2008). We used Cox proportional hazard models to examine whether antigay prejudice was associated with mortality risk among heterosexuals.
Heterosexuals who reported higher levels of antigay prejudice had higher mortality risk than those who reported lower levels (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09, 1.42), with control for multiple risk factors for mortality, including demographics, socioeconomic status, and fair or poor self-rated health. This result translates into a life expectancy difference of approximately 2.5 years (95% CI = 1.0, 4.0 years) between individuals with high versus low levels of antigay prejudice. Furthermore, in sensitivity analyses, antigay prejudice was specifically associated with increased risk of cardiovascular-related causes of death in fully adjusted models (HR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.04, 1.60).
The findings contribute to a growing body of research suggesting that reducing prejudice may improve the health of both minority and majority populations.
我们旨在确定持有恐同偏见的个体是否存在更高的死亡风险。
来自于“综合社会调查”的数据涉及异性恋性取向(n=20226 人,年龄 18-89 岁)、反同态度和死亡风险因素,这些数据与国家死亡指数(1988-2008 年)的死亡数据相链接。我们采用 Cox 比例风险模型来检验异性恋者中的反同偏见是否与死亡风险相关。
报告存在更高水平反同偏见的异性恋者比报告较低水平反同偏见的异性恋者具有更高的死亡风险(危险比 [HR]=1.25;95%置信区间 [CI]=1.09, 1.42),校正了包括人口统计学、社会经济地位以及自评健康状况一般或较差在内的多种死亡风险因素。这一结果意味着在高与低水平反同偏见的个体之间,预期寿命相差约 2.5 年(95%CI=1.0, 4.0 年)。此外,在敏感性分析中,在充分校正模型中,反同偏见与心血管相关死亡原因的风险增加具有特定相关性(HR=1.29;95%CI=1.04, 1.60)。
这些发现有助于越来越多的研究表明,减少偏见可能会改善少数群体和多数群体的健康状况。