Fish Jessica N, Russell Stephen T
University of Texas at Austin.
Fam Relat. 2018 Feb;67(1):12-25. doi: 10.1111/fare.12297. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
Queering questions that which is normative. In this article, we discuss how, for the study of queer families, queering methodologies could reclaim traditional research methods that reflect historically dominant or privileged paradigms. We suggest that queer perspectives may be used to adapt mainstream (i.e., dominant, positivist, empirical) methods, creating possibilities for new, diverse understandings of queer families. We start with comments on the development and current standing of queer family research. We then reflect on several key conceptual and methodological tensions as they apply to queer family studies: lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer individuals ↔ queer families, between-group ↔ within-group, and quantitative ↔ qualitative. In conclusion, we discuss how these methodological considerations provide researchers opportunities to conduct research not only about but queer families. Such research may reflect the diversity of queer families and challenge the normativities and systems of privilege that constrain them.
对规范性的事物提出质疑。在本文中,我们探讨了对于酷儿家庭的研究而言,酷儿方法论如何能够重新利用那些反映历史上占主导地位或享有特权的范式的传统研究方法。我们认为,酷儿视角可用于调整主流(即占主导地位的、实证主义的、经验性的)方法,为对酷儿家庭的新的、多样的理解创造可能性。我们首先评论酷儿家庭研究的发展和现状。然后我们思考适用于酷儿家庭研究的几个关键概念和方法上的紧张关系:女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者和酷儿个体与酷儿家庭之间、群体间与群体内之间,以及定量与定性之间的关系。总之,我们讨论这些方法论上的考量如何为研究人员提供机会,不仅进行关于酷儿家庭的研究,而且是以酷儿视角进行研究。这样的研究可能反映酷儿家庭的多样性,并挑战限制它们的规范性和特权体系。