Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Dec;6(6):493-6. doi: 10.1111/cts.12064. Epub 2013 May 8.
Comparative effectiveness research (CER) and community- based participatory research (CBPR) are two fields of research that do not have a history of strong collaboration. However, CER and CBPR researchers could benefit from interdisciplinary collaboration to design and implement relevant, timely, action-oriented research. This commentary explores field-specific definitions of stakeholders and then outlines various roles stakeholders might play within grant-funded research. Questions such as "What stakeholders should be involved?" and "How are stakeholders involved?" are addressed. The goal of this commentary is to highlight how the expertise and experiences of CBPR investigators can enhance the field of CER and to describe strategies for encouraging stakeholder involvement in CER research through the lens of CBPR. It is recommended that a team-based approach to conducting stakeholder-engaged CER encourages multiple stakeholders and "end users" to contribute their diverse expertise to the research process and contributes to the development of research with an increased likelihood of improving patient health and healthcare.
比较效果研究（CER）和基于社区的参与式研究（CBPR）是两个没有密切合作历史的研究领域。然而，CER 和 CBPR 研究人员可以从跨学科合作中受益，以设计和实施相关、及时、面向行动的研究。本评论探讨了特定领域的利益相关者定义，然后概述了利益相关者在资助研究中可能扮演的各种角色。讨论了“应该涉及哪些利益相关者？”和“如何让利益相关者参与进来？”等问题。本评论的目的是强调 CBPR 调查员的专业知识和经验如何能够增强 CER 领域，并通过 CBPR 的视角描述通过鼓励利益相关者参与 CER 研究来鼓励利益相关者参与的策略。建议采用基于团队的方法来进行利益相关者参与的 CER，鼓励多个利益相关者和“最终用户”为研究过程贡献他们多样化的专业知识，从而有助于开展更有可能改善患者健康和医疗保健的研究。
