• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利益相关者对比较效果研究和以患者为中心的结局研究的接受度不断提高:会议讨论见解

Increasing uptake of comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research among stakeholders: insights from conference discussion.

作者信息

Law Ernest, Harrington Rachel, Alexander G Caleb, Saha Soumi, Oehrlein Elisabeth, Perfetto Eleanor M

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes & Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Feb;7(2):181-191. doi: 10.2217/cer-2017-0060. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

DOI:10.2217/cer-2017-0060
PMID:29465252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6275565/
Abstract

The goal of comparative effectiveness research (CER) and patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) is to improve health outcomes by providing stakeholders with evidence directly relevant to decision making. In January 2017, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association Foundation, alongside the Academy for Managed Care Pharmacy, organized a conference aimed at engaging experts and opinion leaders representing clinicians, patients and payers to identify and discuss barriers and strategies to enhancing uptake and use of CER/PCOR. This report summarizes the conference discussion in the following sections: preconference survey; summary of barriers and strategies to the uptake of CER/PCOR identified by conference attendees; and future perspectives on the field.

摘要

比较效果研究(CER)和以患者为中心的结果研究(PCOR)的目标是通过向利益相关者提供与决策直接相关的证据来改善健康结果。2017年1月,药品研究和制造商协会基金会与管理式医疗药学学会共同组织了一次会议,旨在让代表临床医生、患者和支付方的专家和意见领袖参与进来,以识别和讨论增强CER/PCOR的采用和使用的障碍及策略。本报告在以下章节总结了会议讨论内容:会前调查;会议参与者识别出的CER/PCOR采用的障碍及策略总结;以及该领域的未来展望。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/561c/6275565/706184aa596e/cer-07-181-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/561c/6275565/706184aa596e/cer-07-181-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/561c/6275565/706184aa596e/cer-07-181-g1.jpg

相似文献

1
Increasing uptake of comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research among stakeholders: insights from conference discussion.利益相关者对比较效果研究和以患者为中心的结局研究的接受度不断提高:会议讨论见解
J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Feb;7(2):181-191. doi: 10.2217/cer-2017-0060. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
2
Comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research: enhancing uptake and use by patients, clinicians and payers.比较效果与以患者为中心的结果研究:提高患者、临床医生和支付方的接受度与使用率。
J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Feb;7(2):177-180. doi: 10.2217/cer-2017-0057. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
3
Attitudes toward comparative effectiveness research and patient engagement among reproductive health clinicians.生殖健康临床医生对比较效果研究和患者参与的态度。
J Comp Eff Res. 2017 Jun;6(4):337-345. doi: 10.2217/cer-2016-0068. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
4
A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data.在紧迫的时间内完成艰巨的任务:利益相关者对使用电子临床数据进行的比较有效性研究的看法。
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Sep;1(5):441-51. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.47.
5
Young adult and parent stakeholder perspectives on participation in patient-centered comparative effectiveness research.青年人和家长利益相关者对参与以患者为中心的比较效果研究的看法。
J Comp Eff Res. 2016 Aug;5(5):487-97. doi: 10.2217/cer-2016-0025. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
6
Insights from a conference on implementing comparative effectiveness research through shared decision-making.通过共享决策实施比较效果研究会议的见解。
J Comp Eff Res. 2013 Jan;2(1):23-32. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.67.
7
ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research.ISOQOL 建议在以患者为中心的结局和比较效果研究中使用患者报告结局测量,采用最低标准。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Oct;22(8):1889-905. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0344-y. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
8
The case for a comparative, value-based alternative to the patient-centered outcomes research model for comparative effectiveness research.倡导采用基于价值的、与患者为中心的结果研究模型相比较的方法,作为比较有效性研究的替代方法。
Neurosurg Focus. 2012 Jul;33(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2012.5.FOCUS12127.
9
Translating comparative effectiveness research into Medicaid payment policy: views from medical and pharmacy directors.将比较效果研究转化为医疗补助支付政策:医学及药学主任的观点
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Mar;4(2):79-88. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.68.
10
Comparative Clinical Effectiveness Research Focused on Community-Based Delivery of Palliative Care: Overview of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's Funding Initiative.以社区为基础的姑息治疗服务为重点的临床效果比较研究:患者为中心的结局研究学会资助倡议概述。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;22(S1):2-6. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0370.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging the gap: Identifying diverse stakeholder needs and barriers to accessing evidence and resources for children's pain.弥合差距:识别儿童疼痛领域不同利益相关者的需求以及获取证据和资源的障碍。
Can J Pain. 2022 May 17;6(1):48-64. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2045192. eCollection 2022.
2
Patient-Community Perspectives on Real-World Evidence: Enhancing Engagement, Understanding, and Trust.患者-社区视角下的真实世界证据:增进参与、理解与信任。
Patient. 2019 Aug;12(4):375-381. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00356-z.

本文引用的文献

1
AMCP Partnership Forum: Enabling the Exchange of Clinical and Economic Information Pre-FDA Approval.AMCP 合作论坛:在 FDA 批准前实现临床和经济信息的交流。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jan;23(1):105-112. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.16366. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
2
Distributed data networks: a blueprint for Big Data sharing and healthcare analytics.分布式数据网络:大数据共享与医疗分析的蓝图。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017 Jan;1387(1):105-111. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13287. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
3
Patient activation in older people with long-term conditions and multimorbidity: correlates and change in a cohort study in the United Kingdom.
英国一项队列研究中,患有长期疾病和多种疾病的老年人的患者激活情况:相关性与变化
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 18;16(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1843-2.
4
Health Literacy and Education as Mediators of Racial Disparities in Patient Activation Within an Elderly Patient Cohort.健康素养与教育作为老年患者队列中患者激活方面种族差异的中介因素
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016;27(3):1427-40. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2016.0133.
5
Racial disparities in patient activation: Evaluating the mediating role of health literacy with path analyses.患者激活方面的种族差异:通过路径分析评估健康素养的中介作用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jun;99(6):1033-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.020. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
6
Integrating computerized clinical decision support systems into clinical work: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research.将计算机化临床决策支持系统整合到临床工作中:定性研究的元综合分析
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Dec;84(12):1009-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
7
Design, implementation, and first-year outcomes of a value-based drug formulary.基于价值的药品处方集的设计、实施和第一年结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Apr;21(4):269-75. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.4.269.
8
Nudging guideline-concordant antibiotic prescribing: a randomized clinical trial.促进符合指南的抗生素处方:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Mar;174(3):425-31. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14191.
9
PCOR, CER, and CBPR: alphabet soup or complementary fields of health research?PCOR、CER 和 CBPR:健康研究的字母汤还是互补领域?
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Dec;6(6):493-6. doi: 10.1111/cts.12064. Epub 2013 May 8.
10
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda.以患者为中心的结果研究协会(PCORI)的国家研究重点及初步研究议程。
JAMA. 2012 Apr 18;307(15):1583-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.500.