• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Lessons on Patient and Stakeholder Engagement Strategies for Pipeline to Proposal Awards.从管线到提案奖的患者和利益相关者参与策略的经验教训。
Ethn Dis. 2018 Sep 6;28(Suppl 2):303-310. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.S2.303. eCollection 2018.
2
Engaging patients and stakeholders in preresearch: findings from the Pipeline to Proposal Awards Initiative.在研究前期阶段让患者和利益相关者参与进来:来自“提案前准备到提案奖励倡议”的研究结果。
J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Jul;9(10):721-736. doi: 10.2217/cer-2019-0203. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
3
The Community and Patient Partnered Research Network (CPPRN): Application of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research to Promote Behavioral Health Equity.社区和患者伙伴关系研究网络(CPPRN):应用以患者为中心的结果研究促进行为健康公平。
Ethn Dis. 2018 Sep 6;28(Suppl 2):295-302. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.S2.295. eCollection 2018.
4
Commentary: Community Partner Experiences in CPPR: What Participation in Partnered Research Can Mean to Community and Patient Stakeholders.评论:CPPR 中的社区合作伙伴经验:社区和患者利益相关者参与合作研究意味着什么。
Ethn Dis. 2018 Sep 6;28(Suppl 2):311-316. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.S2.311. eCollection 2018.
5
The ethical challenges and opportunities of implementing engagement strategies in health research.实施健康研究参与策略的伦理挑战与机遇。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
6
Bridging the divide: building infrastructure to support community-academic partnerships and improve capacity to conduct patient-centered outcomes research.弥合差距:构建基础设施以支持社区 - 学术伙伴关系并提高开展以患者为中心的结局研究的能力。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Dec;7(4):773-782. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0487-z.
7
The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research.患者为中心的结果研究所参与度评分标准:研究合作的成功实践
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Mar;15(2):165-170. doi: 10.1370/afm.2042.
8
Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned.患者及利益相关者参与患者为中心的结果研究所试点项目:描述与经验教训
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
9
Go Slow to Go Fast: Successful Engagement Strategies for Patient-Centered, Multi-Site Research, Involving Academic and Community-Based Organizations.慢工出细活:成功实施以患者为中心的多站点研究的参与策略,涉及学术和社区组织。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jan;34(1):125-131. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4701-6. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
10
Researchers, Patients, and Stakeholders Evaluating Comparative-Effectiveness Research: A Mixed-Methods Study of the PCORI Reviewer Experience.研究人员、患者和利益相关者评估比较有效性研究:一项关于 PCORI 评审员经验的混合方法研究。
Value Health. 2018 Oct;21(10):1161-1167. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.03.018. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Community-Engaged Research in HIV Implementation Science: Characterizing Academic and Community Partnerships in the "Ending the HIV Epidemic" Supplement Awards.社区参与的艾滋病病毒实施科学研究:“终结艾滋病流行”补充奖中学术与社区伙伴关系的特征分析
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2025 Apr 15;98(5S):e28-e37. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003633.
2
The Tulumbe! Partnership: a case study in developing a community-led research agenda to address HIV among African immigrants in the United States.图卢姆贝!伙伴关系:一个以社区为主导制定研究议程的案例研究,旨在解决美国非洲移民中的艾滋病毒问题。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 20;12:1406397. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1406397. eCollection 2024.
3
Development of a Culturally Adapted Dietary Intervention to Reduce Alzheimer's Disease Risk among Older Black Adults.开发一种文化适应性的饮食干预措施,以降低老年黑人群体患阿尔茨海默病的风险。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Sep 2;20(17):6705. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20176705.
4
Stakeholder-engaged research is necessary across the criminal-legal spectrum.在整个刑事法律领域,利益相关者参与的研究是必要的。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Nov 15;7(1):e5. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.501. eCollection 2023.
5
Exploring community engaged research experiences and preferences: a multi-level qualitative investigation.探索社区参与式研究经历与偏好:一项多层次定性调查
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Mar 30;7(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00261-6.
6
Researcher perspectives on embedding community stakeholders in T1-T2 research: A potential new model for full-spectrum translational research.研究人员对将社区利益相关者纳入T1-T2研究的看法:全谱转化研究的一种潜在新模式。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Jul 10;3(2-3):120-124. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.384. eCollection 2019 Jun.
7
Editorial: Developments in Community Partnered Participatory Research for Behavioral Health.社论:行为健康领域社区合作参与式研究的进展
Ethn Dis. 2018 Sep 6;28(Suppl 2):287-290. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.S2.287. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Bringing it all back home: Understanding the medical difficulties encountered by newly released prisoners in New Orleans, Louisiana - a qualitative study.回归本源:了解路易斯安那州新奥尔良市刚获释囚犯所面临的医疗困境——一项定性研究
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Jul;25(4):1448-1458. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12445. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
2
CDC Health Disparities and Inequalities Report - United States, 2013. Foreword.《2013年美国疾病控制与预防中心健康差异与不平等报告》。前言。
MMWR Suppl. 2013 Nov 22;62(3):1-2.
3
Community-partnered cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness trial of community engagement and planning or resources for services to address depression disparities.社区伙伴关系的集群随机对照比较有效性试验,旨在通过社区参与和规划或服务资源来解决抑郁症的差异问题。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Oct;28(10):1268-78. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2484-3. Epub 2013 May 7.
4
Community-based participatory development of a community health worker mental health outreach role to extend collaborative care in post-Katrina New Orleans.基于社区的参与式发展,培养社区卫生工作者发挥精神健康外展作用,以扩大卡特里娜飓风后的新奥尔良的合作式关怀。
Ethn Dis. 2011 Summer;21(3 Suppl 1):S1-45-51.
5
Building community resilience through mental health infrastructure and training in post-Katrina New Orleans.通过心理健康基础设施和培训,在卡特里娜飓风后的新奥尔良建立社区韧性。
Ethn Dis. 2011 Summer;21(3 Suppl 1):S1-20-9.
6
"From the prison door right to the sidewalk, everything went downhill," a qualitative study of the health experiences of recently released inmates.从监狱大门到人行道,一切都每况愈下,这是对最近刚获释囚犯健康经历的一项定性研究。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011 Jul-Aug;34(4):249-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.07.002. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
7
More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation.超越塔斯基吉:理解对参与研究的不信任
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Aug;21(3):879-97. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0323.
8
The Healthy African American Families (HAAF) project: from community-based participatory research to community-partnered participatory research.健康非裔美国家庭(HAAF)项目:从社区为基础的参与式研究到社区伙伴参与式研究。
Ethn Dis. 2010 Winter;20(1 Suppl 2):S2-1-8.
9
Begin your partnership: the process of engagement.开始你们的合作关系:参与的过程。
Ethn Dis. 2009 Autumn;19(4 Suppl 6):S6-8-16.
10
Strategies for academic and clinician engagement in community-participatory partnered research.学术人员和临床医生参与社区参与式合作研究的策略。
JAMA. 2007 Jan 24;297(4):407-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.4.407.

从管线到提案奖的患者和利益相关者参与策略的经验教训。

Lessons on Patient and Stakeholder Engagement Strategies for Pipeline to Proposal Awards.

机构信息

Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA.

Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA.

出版信息

Ethn Dis. 2018 Sep 6;28(Suppl 2):303-310. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.S2.303. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.18865/ed.28.S2.303
PMID:30202182
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6128329/
Abstract

The Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) supports patient-centered clinical comparative effectiveness research (CER) including health disparities and engagement portfolios. In 2013, PCORI launched the Pipeline to Proposal (P2P) mechanism to support development of novel patient- and stakeholder-centered partnerships focused on designing clinical CER funding proposals. By providing a tiered structure of successive small contracts and technical assistance, the P2P mechanism encourages development of new research partnerships among diverse stakeholders. As a comparatively new field, patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) has few well-delineated methods for engaging patients and other non-scientists in effective teams with academics or clinicians to develop and implement rigorous, scientific research proposals. Community partnered participatory research (CPPR) provides a useful framework for structuring new partnerships. In this article we highlight the origins, development, and prospects of three current examples of funded P2P initiatives based in New Orleans and Los Angeles. We outline how these projects - Prisoner to Patient, the NOLA Partnership, and Resilience Among African American Men - use CPPR principles. We also describe how they have collaborated with, and contributed to, a two-way learning and knowledge exchange among members of the PCORI-funded Community and Patient Partnered Research Network. Lessons learned may be applicable to other groups planning to create new partnerships focused on implementing PCOR.

摘要

患者为中心的结局研究学会(PCORI)支持以患者为中心的临床对比效果研究(CER),包括健康差异和参与组合。2013 年,PCORI 启动了“从提案到项目”(P2P)机制,以支持以新颖的以患者和利益相关者为中心的伙伴关系为重点的设计临床 CER 资助提案。通过提供一系列连续的小合同和技术援助的分层结构,P2P 机制鼓励不同利益相关者之间发展新的研究伙伴关系。作为一个相对较新的领域,以患者为中心的结果研究(PCOR)在让患者和其他非科学家与学者或临床医生一起有效参与到团队中,以制定和实施严格的、科学的研究提案方面,方法寥寥无几。社区合作参与式研究(CPPR)为构建新的伙伴关系提供了一个有用的框架。本文重点介绍了基于新奥尔良和洛杉矶的三个当前资助的 P2P 倡议的起源、发展和前景。我们概述了这些项目——从囚犯到患者、新奥尔良伙伴关系和非裔美国男性的韧性——如何运用 CPPR 原则。我们还描述了它们如何与 PCORI 资助的社区和患者伙伴关系研究网络的成员进行合作,并为他们之间的双向学习和知识交流做出贡献。所吸取的经验教训可能适用于其他计划创建专注于实施 PCOR 的新伙伴关系的团体。