Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vaccine. 2013 Dec 31;31 Suppl 7:H71-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.086.
We studied the cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer prevention strategies in the Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia (CEECA) region. The cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV)16/18 vaccination of 12 year-old girls was calculated for 28 countries, under the assumption that vaccination prevents 70% of all cervical cancer cases and that cervical cancer and all-cause mortality rates are stable without vaccination. At three-dose vaccination costs of I$ 100 per vaccinated girl (currency 2005 international dollars), HPV16/18 vaccination was very cost-effective in 25 out of 28 countries using the country's gross domestic product (GDP) per capita as cost-effectiveness threshold (criterion by World Health Organization). A three-dose vaccination cost of I$ 100 is within the current range of vaccine costs in European immunization programs, and therefore our results indicate that HPV vaccination may be good value for money. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening combined with vaccination, we calibrated a published simulation model to HPV genotype data collected in Slovenia, Poland, and Georgia. The screening interval was varied at 3, 6, and 10 years starting at age 25 or 30 and ending at age 60. In Slovenia and Poland, combined vaccination and 10-yearly HPV (DNA) screening (vaccination coverage 70%, screening coverage per round 70%) was very cost-effective when the cost of three-dose vaccination was I$ 100 per vaccinated girl. More intensive screening was very cost-effective when the screening coverage per round was 30% or 50%. In Georgia, 10-yearly Pap screening was very cost-effective in unvaccinated women. Vaccination combined with 10-yearly HPV screening was likely to be cost-effective if the three-dose vaccination cost was I$ 50 per vaccinated girl. To conclude, cervical cancer prevention strategies utilizing both HPV16/18 vaccination and HPV screening are very cost-effective in countries with sufficient resources. In low-resource settings, low vaccine pricing is essential for strategies of combined vaccination and screening to be cost-effective. This article forms part of a regional report entitled "Comprehensive Control of HPV Infections and Related Diseases in the Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia Region" Vaccine Volume 31, Supplement 7, 2013. Updates of the progress in the field are presented in a separate monograph entitled "Comprehensive Control of HPV Infections and Related Diseases" Vaccine Volume 30, Supplement 5, 2012.
我们研究了在中东欧和中亚(CEECA)地区实施宫颈癌预防策略的成本效益。假设 HPV16/18 疫苗接种可预防 70%的宫颈癌病例,且宫颈癌和全因死亡率不因接种而变化,我们计算了为 28 个国家的 12 岁女孩接种 HPV 疫苗的成本效益。在每接种 1 名女孩疫苗花费 100 美元(2005 年国际元)的情况下,以各国人均国内生产总值(GDP)作为成本效益阈值(世界卫生组织标准),28 个国家中有 25 个国家认为 HPV16/18 疫苗接种非常具有成本效益。每接种 1 名女孩疫苗花费 100 美元的价格在欧洲免疫计划中的疫苗费用范围内,因此我们的研究结果表明 HPV 疫苗接种可能是物有所值的。为了评估宫颈癌筛查与疫苗接种相结合的成本效益,我们根据在斯洛文尼亚、波兰和格鲁吉亚收集的 HPV 基因型数据对已发表的模拟模型进行了校准。筛查间隔在 25 岁或 30 岁开始、60 岁结束时,从 3 年、6 年和 10 年不等。在斯洛文尼亚和波兰,当每接种 1 名女孩的疫苗费用为 100 美元时,HPV(DNA)筛查(疫苗接种覆盖率为 70%,每轮筛查覆盖率为 70%)与疫苗接种相结合的方案具有很高的成本效益。当每轮筛查覆盖率为 30%或 50%时,更密集的筛查具有很高的成本效益。在格鲁吉亚,未接种疫苗的女性进行巴氏涂片筛查非常具有成本效益。如果每接种 1 名女孩的疫苗费用为 50 美元,那么 HPV 疫苗接种与 10 年一次的 HPV 筛查相结合的方案很可能具有成本效益。综上所述,在资源充足的国家,利用 HPV16/18 疫苗接种和 HPV 筛查的宫颈癌预防策略具有很高的成本效益。在资源匮乏的环境中,降低疫苗价格对于结合疫苗接种和筛查的策略具有成本效益至关重要。本文是题为“中东欧和中亚地区人乳头瘤病毒感染及相关疾病综合控制”的区域报告的一部分疫苗第 31 卷增刊 7,2013 年。在题为“人乳头瘤病毒感染及相关疾病综合控制”的单独专论中介绍了该领域的最新进展疫苗第 30 卷增刊 5,2012 年。