Matheson C, Jaffray M, Ryan M, Bond C M, Fraser K, Kirk M, Liddell D
Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Division of Applied Medicine (Psychiatry), University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Int J Drug Policy. 2014 May;25(3):407-15. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 17.
Research evidence is strong for opiate replacement treatment (ORT). However, public opinion (attitudes) can be at odds with evidence. This study explored the relationships between, attitudes, knowledge of drugs and a range of socio-demographic variables that potentially influence attitude. This is relevant in the current policy arena in which a major shift from harm reduction to, rehabilitation is underway.
A cross sectional postal questionnaire survey in Scotland was conducted where the drug, treatment strategy has changed from harm-reduction to recovery-based. A random sample (N=3000), of the general public, >18 years, and on the electoral register was used. The questionnaire was largely structured with tick box format but included two open questions for qualitative responses. Valuation was measured using the economic willingness-to-pay (WTP) method.
The response rate was 38.1% (1067/2803). Less than 10% had personal experience of drug, misuse but 16.7% had experience of drug misuse via a friend/acquaintance. Regression modelling revealed more positive attitudes towards drug users in those with personal experience of drug misuse, (p<0.001), better knowledge of drugs (p=0.001) and higher income (those earning >£50,000 per, annum compared to <£15K; p=0.01). Over half of respondents were not willing to pay anything for drug treatment indicating they did not value these treatments at all. Respondents were willing-to-pay most for community rehabilitation and least for methadone maintenance treatment. Qualitative analysis of open responses indicated many strong negative attitudes, doubts over the efficacy of methadone and consideration of addiction as self-inflicted. There was ambivalence with respondents weighing up negative feelings towards treatment against societal benefit.
There is a gap between public attitudes and evidence regarding drug treatment. Findings suggest a way forward might be to develop and evaluate treatment that integrates ORT with a community rehabilitative approach. Evaluation of public engagement/education to improve knowledge of drug treatment effectiveness is recommended.
阿片类药物替代疗法(ORT)的研究证据确凿。然而,公众舆论(态度)可能与证据不一致。本研究探讨了态度、药物知识以及一系列可能影响态度的社会人口统计学变量之间的关系。这在当前政策领域具有相关性,因为正在发生从减少伤害到康复的重大转变。
在苏格兰进行了一项横断面邮寄问卷调查,当地的药物治疗策略已从减少伤害转变为基于康复。采用了一个随机样本(N = 3000),来自18岁以上且在选民登记册上的普通公众。问卷主要采用勾选框格式,但包括两个开放式问题以获取定性回答。估值采用经济支付意愿(WTP)方法进行测量。
回复率为38.1%(1067/2803)。不到10%的人有药物滥用的个人经历,但16.7%的人通过朋友/熟人有药物滥用的经历。回归模型显示,有药物滥用个人经历的人对吸毒者的态度更积极(p < 0.001),药物知识更好(p = 0.001)且收入更高(年收入超过50,000英镑的人与低于15,000英镑的人相比;p = 0.01)。超过一半的受访者不愿意为药物治疗支付任何费用,表明他们根本不重视这些治疗。受访者愿意为社区康复支付最多,为美沙酮维持治疗支付最少。对开放式回答的定性分析表明,许多人持有强烈的负面态度,对美沙酮的疗效表示怀疑,并认为成瘾是自我造成的。受访者在权衡对治疗的负面感受与社会效益时存在矛盾心理。
公众对药物治疗的态度与证据之间存在差距。研究结果表明,前进的方向可能是开发和评估将ORT与社区康复方法相结合的治疗方法。建议评估公众参与/教育,以提高对药物治疗效果的认识。