Kline Anna, Weiner Marc D, Ciccone Donald S, Interian Alejandro, St Hill Lauren, Losonczy Miklos
Department of Veterans Affairs-New Jersey Health Care System, Lyons, NJ, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Bloustein Center for Survey Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
J Psychiatr Res. 2014 Mar;50:18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.11.007. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
Studies show high rates of co-morbid post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) but there is no consensus on the causal direction of the relationship. Some theories suggest AUD develops as a coping mechanism to manage PTSD symptoms and others that AUD is a vulnerability factor for PTSD. A third hypothesis posits independent developmental pathways stemming from a shared etiology, such as the trauma exposure itself. We examined these hypotheses using longitudinal data on 922 National Guard soldiers, representing a subsample (56%) of a larger pre- and post-deployment cross-sectional study of New Jersey National Guard soldiers deployed to Iraq. Measures included the PTSD Checklist (PCL), DSM-IV-based measures of alcohol use/misuse from the National Household Survey of Drug Use and Health and other concurrent mental health, military and demographic measures. Results showed no effect of pre-deployment alcohol status on subsequent positive screens for new onset PTSD. However, in multivariate models, baseline PTSD symptoms significantly increased the risk of screening positive for new onset alcohol dependence (AD), which rose 5% with each unit increase in PCL score (AOR = 1.05; 95% CI = 1.02-1.07). Results also supported the shared etiology hypothesis, with the risk of a positive screen for AD increasing by 9% for every unit increase in combat exposure after controlling for baseline PTSD status (AOR = 1.09; 95% CI = 1.03-1.15) and, in a subsample with PCL scores <34, by 17% for each unit increase in exposure (AOR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.05-1.31). These findings have implications for prevention, treatment and compensation policies governing co-morbidity in military veterans.
研究表明,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和酒精使用障碍(AUD)的共病率很高,但对于二者关系的因果方向尚无定论。一些理论认为,酒精使用障碍是作为一种应对机制来处理创伤后应激障碍症状而发展起来的,另一些理论则认为酒精使用障碍是创伤后应激障碍的一个易患因素。第三个假设提出,二者源于共同病因,如创伤暴露本身,各自独立发展。我们利用922名国民警卫队士兵的纵向数据对这些假设进行了检验,这些士兵是新泽西国民警卫队部署到伊拉克的一项更大规模的部署前和部署后横断面研究的子样本(56%)。测量指标包括创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL)、基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM-IV)的酒精使用/滥用测量指标(来自全国药物使用和健康家庭调查)以及其他同时期的心理健康、军事和人口统计学测量指标。结果显示,部署前的酒精状态对随后新发创伤后应激障碍的阳性筛查结果没有影响。然而,在多变量模型中,基线创伤后应激障碍症状显著增加了新发酒精依赖(AD)阳性筛查的风险,PCL评分每增加一个单位,风险上升5%(比值比[AOR]=1.05;95%置信区间[CI]=1.02 - 1.07)。结果还支持了共同病因假设,在控制基线创伤后应激障碍状态后,战斗暴露每增加一个单位,酒精依赖阳性筛查的风险增加9%(AOR = 1.09;95% CI = 1.03 - 1.15);在PCL评分<34的子样本中,暴露每增加一个单位,风险增加17%(AOR = 1.17;95% CI = 1.05 - 1.31)。这些发现对管理退伍军人共病的预防、治疗和补偿政策具有启示意义。