Suppr超能文献

衡量艾伯塔省癌症预防政策联盟的能力建设进展情况。

Measuring the progress of capacity building in the Alberta Policy Coalition for Cancer Prevention.

作者信息

Raine Kim D, Sosa Hernandez Cristabel, Nykiforuk Candace I J, Reed Shandy, Montemurro Genevieve, Lytvyak Ellina, MacLellan-Wright Mary-Frances

机构信息

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2014 Jul;15(4):496-505. doi: 10.1177/1524839913511627. Epub 2013 Dec 13.

Abstract

The Alberta Policy Coalition for Cancer Prevention (APCCP) represents practitioners, policy makers, researchers, and community organizations working together to coordinate efforts and advocate for policy change to reduce chronic diseases. The aim of this research was to capture changes in the APCCP's capacity to advance its goals over the course of its operation. We adapted the Public Health Agency of Canada's validated Community Capacity-Building Tool to capture policy work. All members of the APCCP were invited to complete the tool in 2010 and 2011. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and t tests. Qualitative comments were analyzed using thematic content analysis. A group process for reaching consensus provided context to the survey responses and contributed to a participatory analysis. Significant improvement was observed in eight out of nine capacity domains. Lessons learned highlight the importance of balancing volume and diversity of intersectoral representation to ensure effective participation, as well as aligning professional and economic resources. Defining involvement and roles within a coalition can be a challenging activity contingent on the interests of each sector represented. The participatory analysis enabled the group to reflect on progress made and future directions for policy advocacy.

摘要

艾伯塔癌症预防政策联盟(APCCP)代表从业者、政策制定者、研究人员和社区组织,他们共同努力协调工作,并倡导政策变革以减少慢性病。本研究的目的是了解APCCP在其运营过程中推进目标的能力变化。我们采用了加拿大公共卫生署经过验证的社区能力建设工具来记录政策工作。2010年和2011年,APCCP的所有成员都被邀请完成该工具。使用描述性统计和t检验对回复进行分析。定性评论采用主题内容分析法进行分析。达成共识的小组过程为调查回复提供了背景,并有助于进行参与式分析。在九个能力领域中的八个领域观察到了显著改善。吸取的经验教训强调了平衡部门间代表的数量和多样性以确保有效参与的重要性,以及协调专业和经济资源的重要性。在联盟中定义参与和角色可能是一项具有挑战性的活动,这取决于所代表的每个部门的利益。参与式分析使该小组能够反思所取得的进展以及政策倡导的未来方向。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验