• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共卫生领域多部门联盟有效性关键因素的系统评价

A Systematic Review of Key Factors in the Effectiveness of Multisector Alliances in the Public Health Domain.

作者信息

Wiggins Bonnie, Anastasiou Kim, Cox David N

机构信息

Nutrition and Health, Health and Biosecurity, 2221CSIRO, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2021 Jan;35(1):93-105. doi: 10.1177/0890117120928789. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1177/0890117120928789
PMID:32489103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7747138/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic literature review is to assess the factors associated with synergistic multisector alliances in the public health domain.

DATA SOURCE

Articles in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Google Scholar between March 2009 and February 2019 were searched.

STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Included alliances had a public health and behavioral focus, were from the public or private sector, and were multipartner and multisector, and from high-income countries. Public health research alliances were included, but clinical research alliances were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extraction included alliance description, alliance domain, country, single or multiple alliances, and the sectors included in the alliance. Two theoretical frameworks were used in data extraction.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Data were coded according to 28 factors representing antecedents, management, and evaluation (Parent and Harvey model) and 3 output-specific factors (Bergen model).

RESULTS

A final 24 papers were included, of which 58% contained synergistic alliances. While almost all factors reportedly enabled synergy, some factors were more frequently associated with synergistic alliances, including clear purpose and positive coordination, information sharing, and evaluation of project outcomes. Complexity within some factors was also reported.

CONCLUSION

The theoretical models were supported by the data. Public health alliances would likely benefit from incorporating factors identified as beneficial for synergy and from carefully considering the management of complex factors.

摘要

目的

本系统文献综述旨在评估与公共卫生领域协同多部门联盟相关的因素。

数据来源

检索了2009年3月至2019年2月期间PubMed、CINAHL、Scopus和谷歌学术上的文章。

研究纳入和排除标准

纳入的联盟以公共卫生和行为为重点,来自公共或私营部门,是多伙伴和多部门的,且来自高收入国家。纳入公共卫生研究联盟,但排除临床研究联盟。

数据提取

数据提取包括联盟描述、联盟领域、国家、单一或多个联盟以及联盟中包含的部门。在数据提取中使用了两个理论框架。

数据综合

根据代表前因、管理和评估的28个因素(Parent和Harvey模型)以及3个特定产出因素(Bergen模型)对数据进行编码。

结果

最终纳入24篇论文,其中58%包含协同联盟。虽然据报道几乎所有因素都能实现协同,但有些因素与协同联盟的关联更为频繁,包括明确的目标和积极的协调、信息共享以及对项目成果的评估。还报告了一些因素中的复杂性。

结论

数据支持这些理论模型。公共卫生联盟可能会从纳入被确定为有利于协同的因素以及仔细考虑复杂因素的管理中受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfbe/7747138/ac389d19aa9d/10.1177_0890117120928789-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfbe/7747138/14def64bc93b/10.1177_0890117120928789-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfbe/7747138/ac389d19aa9d/10.1177_0890117120928789-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfbe/7747138/14def64bc93b/10.1177_0890117120928789-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfbe/7747138/ac389d19aa9d/10.1177_0890117120928789-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
A Systematic Review of Key Factors in the Effectiveness of Multisector Alliances in the Public Health Domain.公共卫生领域多部门联盟有效性关键因素的系统评价
Am J Health Promot. 2021 Jan;35(1):93-105. doi: 10.1177/0890117120928789. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
2
The Healthy ALLiances (HALL) framework: prerequisites for success.健康联盟(HALL)框架:成功的前提。
Fam Pract. 2012 Apr;29 Suppl 1:i132-i138. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr088.
3
The private partners of public health: public-private alliances for public good.公共卫生的私营合作伙伴:为公益事业的公私联盟。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2009 Apr;6(2):A69. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
4
Cross-Sector Strategic Alliances Between Health Care Organizations and Community-Based Organizations: Marrying Theory and Practice.医疗机构与社区组织间跨部门战略联盟:理论与实践的联姻。
Adv Health Care Manag. 2022 Dec 12;21. doi: 10.1108/S1474-823120220000021005.
5
Dissemination of quality improvement innovations by multisector health care alliances.多部门医疗保健联盟传播质量改进创新。
J Health Organ Manag. 2019 Jun 28;33(4):511-528. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-08-2017-0195. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
6
Challenges of capacity building in multisector community health alliances.多部门社区卫生联盟能力建设面临的挑战。
Health Educ Behav. 2010 Oct;37(5):645-64. doi: 10.1177/1090198110363883. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
7
Funding profiles of multisector health care alliances and their positioning for sustainability.多部门医疗保健联盟的资金状况及其可持续性定位。
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Jun 18;32(4):587-602. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2018-0003. Epub 2018 May 18.
8
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
9
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
Computational modeling and analysis of medical resource shortages in hospital alliance: A simulation-driven approach.医院联盟中医疗资源短缺的计算建模与分析:一种模拟驱动方法
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 26;20(8):e0330871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330871. eCollection 2025.
2
Enhancing multi-sectoral collaborations for the prevention and control of NCDs in Thailand with a new approach.采用新方法加强泰国非传染性疾病防控的多部门合作。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Dec 18;22(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01262-z.
3
Effectiveness of Network Relations in Poland during the Economic Crisis Caused by COVID-19: Interorganizational Network Viewpoints.

本文引用的文献

1
A mixed-method evaluation of the New York State Eat Well Play Hard Community Projects: Building local capacity for sustainable childhood obesity prevention.纽约州“吃得健康,玩得开心”社区项目的混合方法评估:建设当地预防儿童肥胖的可持续能力。
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Apr;67:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
2
Effective Partnership in Community-Based Health Promotion: Lessons from the Health Literacy Partnership.基于社区的健康促进中的有效伙伴关系:健康素养伙伴关系的经验教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 11;14(12):1550. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121550.
3
Measurement and evaluation practices of factors that contribute to effective health promotion collaboration functioning: A scoping review.
网络关系在 COVID-19 经济危机期间的波兰的有效性:组织间网络视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 9;20(2):1178. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021178.
4
Community networks of sport and physical activity promotion: an analysis of structural properties and conditions of cooperation.社区体育与体育活动促进网络:结构属性与合作条件分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;22(1):1966. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14383-3.
5
Facilitators of Multisector Collaboration for Delivering Cancer Control Interventions in Rural Communities: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.促进多部门协作以在农村社区实施癌症控制干预措施:一项描述性定性研究。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2022 Aug 11;19:E48. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.210450.
6
A conceptual framework for analysing partnership and synergy in a global health alliance: case of the UK Public Health Rapid Support Team.用于分析全球卫生联盟伙伴关系和协同作用的概念框架:以英国公共卫生快速支援小组为例。
Health Policy Plan. 2022 Mar 4;37(3):322-336. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab150.
7
Drowning prevention: turning the tide on a leading killer.溺水预防:扭转头号杀手的局面。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Sep;6(9):e692-e695. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00165-1. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
促进有效健康促进合作功能的因素的测量与评估实践:一项范围综述
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Apr;61:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.11.013. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
4
The role of a food policy coalition in influencing a local food environment: an Australian case study.食品政策联盟在影响当地食品环境中的作用:一项澳大利亚的案例研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Apr;20(5):917-926. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016003001. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
5
Examining the role of a community coalition in facilitating policy and environmental changes to promote physical activity: the case of Get Fit Kaua'i.考察社区联盟在推动政策与环境变革以促进身体活动方面的作用:以考艾岛健身计划为例。
Transl Behav Med. 2016 Dec;6(4):638-647. doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0379-z.
6
What makes intersectoral partnerships for health promotion work? A review of the international literature.促进健康的跨部门伙伴关系为何奏效?国际文献综述。
Health Promot Int. 2018 Feb 1;33(1):4-26. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw061.
7
A Community-Based Participatory Research Approach for Preventing Childhood Obesity: The Communities and Schools Together Project.一种基于社区的预防儿童肥胖参与式研究方法:“社区与学校携手”项目
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Autumn;9(3):351-61. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0056.
8
A Participatory Regional Partnership Approach to Promote Nutrition and Physical Activity Through Environmental and Policy Change in Rural Missouri.一种通过密苏里州农村地区的环境与政策变革促进营养与身体活动的参与式区域伙伴关系方法。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jun 11;12:E92. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140593.
9
Who's who in the crew? Exploring participant involvement in the Active Living Coalition.团队成员都有谁?探索积极生活联盟中的参与者参与情况。
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Jun;50:88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
10
Building effective partnerships to improve birth outcomes by reducing obesity: The B'more Fit for healthy babies coalition of Baltimore.建立有效的伙伴关系以通过减少肥胖来改善分娩结局:巴尔的摩的“B'more Fit for healthy babies”联盟。
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Aug;51:53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.12.007. Epub 2014 Dec 10.