Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755.
Am Nat. 2014 Jan;183(1):E1-16. doi: 10.1086/674010. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
Previous models of diamond-shaped and intraguild predation community modules have represented the essence of the trade-off necessary for a top predator to prevent competitive exclusion among a set of resource-limited consumers. However, at most two consumers can coexist in these models. In this article, I show how intraspecific density dependence in the consumers can permit many more than two consumers to coexist in these community modules. Moreover, responses of the community to removal of the top predator depend on the patterns of the strengths of species interactions relative to the strengths of intraspecific density dependence. If the consumers experience similar strengths of intraspecific density dependence, removing the top predator will in most cases have little effect on consumer species richness. A substantial reduction in consumer species richness with predator removal (i.e., the keystone predation effect) will typically occur only when the consumer that can support a population at the lowest resource abundance also (1) experiences substantially weaker intraspecific density dependence than other consumers and (2) experiences significantly higher levels of mortality from the predator. These results identify how intraspecific density dependence fosters the coexistence of multiple consumers in two important community modules and shapes the responses of these community modules to perturbations such as predator removal.
先前的菱形和种内捕食社区模块模型代表了顶级捕食者为防止一组资源有限的消费者之间的竞争排斥所必需的权衡的本质。然而,在这些模型中,最多只能有两个消费者共存。在本文中,我展示了消费者种内密度依赖性如何允许这些社区模块中存在多个消费者共存。此外,社区对顶级捕食者去除的反应取决于物种间相互作用的强度与种内密度依赖性的强度的关系。如果消费者经历相似的种内密度依赖性,那么去除顶级捕食者通常不会对消费者物种丰富度产生太大影响。只有当在资源最匮乏时能够支撑种群的消费者(1)经历比其他消费者弱得多的种内密度依赖性,并且(2)受到捕食者的死亡率显著更高时,去除捕食者才会导致消费者物种丰富度大量减少(即关键捕食作用)。这些结果确定了种内密度依赖性如何促进两个重要社区模块中多个消费者的共存,并塑造了这些社区模块对捕食者去除等扰动的反应。