• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种内密度制约和以同一资源为食的消费者共生。

Intraspecific density dependence and a guild of consumers coexisting on one resource.

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA.

出版信息

Ecology. 2012 Dec;93(12):2728-35. doi: 10.1890/12-0797.1.

DOI:10.1890/12-0797.1
PMID:23431602
Abstract

The importance of negative intraspecific density dependence to promoting species coexistence in a community is well accepted. However, such mechanisms are typically omitted from more explicit models of community dynamics. Here I analyze a variation of the Rosenzweig-MacArthur consumer-resource model that includes negative intraspecific density dependence for consumers to explore its effect on the coexistence of multiple consumers feeding on a single resource. This analysis demonstrates that a guild of multiple consumers can easily coexist on a single resource if each limits its own abundance to some degree, and stronger intraspecific density dependence permits a wider variety of consumers to coexist. The mechanism permitting multiple consumers to coexist works in a fashion similar to apparent competition or to each consumer having its own specialized predator. These results argue for a more explicit emphasis on how negative intraspecific density dependence is generated and how these mechanisms combine with species interactions to shape overall community structure.

摘要

种内密度制约对于促进群落中物种共存的重要性已被广泛认可。然而,在更明确的群落动态模型中,这些机制通常被忽略。本文分析了包含消费者种内密度制约的 Rosenzweig-MacArthur 消费-资源模型的一个变体,以探讨其对单一资源上多个消费者共存的影响。分析表明,如果每个消费者都在某种程度上限制自身的丰度,那么一个由多个消费者组成的类群就可以很容易地在单一资源上共存,而更强的种内密度制约则允许更多种类的消费者共存。允许多个消费者共存的机制的工作方式类似于明显竞争或每个消费者都有自己专门的捕食者。这些结果表明,需要更明确地强调种内密度制约是如何产生的,以及这些机制如何与物种相互作用结合来塑造整体群落结构。

相似文献

1
Intraspecific density dependence and a guild of consumers coexisting on one resource.种内密度制约和以同一资源为食的消费者共生。
Ecology. 2012 Dec;93(12):2728-35. doi: 10.1890/12-0797.1.
2
Keystone and intraguild predation, intraspecific density dependence, and a guild of coexisting consumers.关键种和种内捕食、种内密度制约以及共存消费者的一个类群。
Am Nat. 2014 Jan;183(1):E1-16. doi: 10.1086/674010. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
3
Biodiversity, habitat area, resource growth rate and interference competition.生物多样性、栖息地面积、资源增长率和干扰竞争。
Bull Math Biol. 2003 May;65(3):497-518. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8240(03)00008-9.
4
Disentangling ecologically equivalent from neutral species: The mechanisms of population regulation matter.厘清生态等价种与中性种:种群调节机制很重要。
J Anim Ecol. 2019 Nov;88(11):1755-1765. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13072. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
5
Coexistence and community structure in a consumer resource model with implicit stoichiometry.具有隐含化学计量学的消费者-资源模型中的共存与群落结构
Theor Popul Biol. 2012 Sep;82(2):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
6
Biodiversity as both a cause and consequence of resource availability: a study of reciprocal causality in a predator-prey system.生物多样性作为资源可利用性的原因和结果:对捕食者 - 猎物系统中相互因果关系的一项研究。
J Anim Ecol. 2006 Mar;75(2):497-505. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01070.x.
7
Consumer interaction strength may limit the diversifying effect of intraspecific competition: a test in alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus).消费者互动强度可能限制种内竞争的多样化效应:鲥鱼(Alosa pseudoharengus)的试验。
Am Nat. 2013 Jun;181(6):815-26. doi: 10.1086/670197. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
8
Species coexistence under resource competition with intraspecific and interspecific direct competition in a chemostat.在恒化器中存在种内和种间直接竞争的资源竞争下的物种共存。
Theor Popul Biol. 2010 Nov;78(3):173-82. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2010.07.003. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
9
Seed-cache exchange promotes coexistence and coupled consumer oscillations: a model of desert rodents as resource processors.种子缓存交换促进共存和耦合消费者振荡:以沙漠啮齿动物作为资源处理器的模型。
J Theor Biol. 2003 Jul 21;223(2):215-31. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00088-2.
10
The impact of consumer-resource cycles on the coexistence of competing consumers.消费者-资源循环对竞争消费者共存的影响。
Theor Popul Biol. 2002 Nov;62(3):281-95. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.2002.1614.

引用本文的文献

1
Dispersal of a dominant competitor can drive multispecies coexistence in biofilms.优势竞争者的扩散可以促进生物膜中的多物种共存。
Curr Biol. 2024 Sep 23;34(18):4129-4142.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.07.078. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
2
Positive density dependence acting on mortality can help maintain species-rich communities.正密度制约作用于死亡率有助于维持物种丰富的群落。
Elife. 2020 Jun 18;9:e57788. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57788.
3
Mixotrophy in nanoflagellates across environmental gradients in the ocean.海洋环境梯度中纳米鞭毛虫的混合营养
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 26;116(13):6211-6220. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814860116. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
4
Ecological opportunity and the adaptive diversification of lineages.生态机遇与谱系的适应性多样化
Ecol Evol. 2015 Jan;5(1):176-95. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1347. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
5
Density-dependent habitat selection and partitioning between two sympatric ungulates.密度依赖型栖息地选择以及两种同域有蹄类动物之间的生态位划分
Oecologia. 2014 Aug;175(4):1155-65. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-2978-7. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
6
Consequences of variation in foraging success among predators on numerical response.捕食者觅食成功率变化对数量反应的影响。
Ecol Evol. 2013 Oct;3(11):4039-43. doi: 10.1002/ece3.772. Epub 2013 Sep 17.