Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS, Carretera de Colmenar Km 9,1, 28034, Madrid, Spain,
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;252(2):321-30. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2529-7. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
The incidence of false positive (FP) results of optic coherence tomography (OCT) retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) color code in healthy subjects can be very high with Cirrus OCT. Recent evidence has shown that OCT parameters derived from macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) have excellent ability to discriminate between normal eyes and eyes with early glaucoma.
This was a prospective, cross-sectional study. One hundred eyes from 50 healthy volunteers underwent circumpapillary scanning by Cirrus and Spectralis OCT and macular scanning using Cirrus OCT. FP rates for each of the OCT parameters, using predefined criteria for an abnormal test were calculated. Comparative analysis was performed using the McNemar test. A generalized estimating equations model (GEE) was used to compare demographic and clinical factors between the eyes with normal findings and eyes with abnormal results.
The overall RNFL color-code FP rate was significantly higher for Cirrus (39 %) than for Spectralis (18 %) (P = 0.000). The Spectralis RNFL FP rate showed no significant difference when compared to the FP rate by Cirrus GCIPL (13 %) and ONH (11 %) analysis. Axial length, mean spherical equivalent, presence of peripapillary atrophy, and tilted disc were significantly related to the RNFL FP occurrence displayed by both devices.
Spectralis might be more specific than Cirrus when evaluating the RNFL thickness for Caucasians and moderate myopic population. GCIPL and ONH analysis might be more useful than RNFL thickness to evaluate this population using Cirrus OCT.
Cirrus OCT 视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)彩色编码在健康受试者中假阳性(FP)结果的发生率可能非常高。最近的证据表明,来自黄斑神经节细胞-内丛状层(GCIPL)的 OCT 参数具有极好的能力来区分正常眼和早期青光眼眼。
这是一项前瞻性、横断面研究。50 名健康志愿者的 100 只眼接受 Cirrus 和 Spectralis OCT 的环周扫描和 Cirrus OCT 的黄斑扫描。使用预定义的异常测试标准计算每个 OCT 参数的 FP 率。使用 McNemar 检验进行比较分析。使用广义估计方程模型(GEE)比较正常组和异常组的人口统计学和临床因素。
Cirrus 的整体 RNFL 彩色编码 FP 率(39%)明显高于 Spectralis(18%)(P=0.000)。与 Cirrus GCIPL(13%)和 ONH(11%)分析的 FP 率相比,Spectralis RNFL 的 FP 率没有显著差异。眼轴长度、平均等效球镜、视盘周围萎缩的存在和倾斜盘与两种设备显示的 RNFL FP 发生显著相关。
对于白种人和中度近视人群,Spectralis 在评估 RNFL 厚度时可能比 Cirrus 更具特异性。使用 Cirrus OCT,GCIPL 和 ONH 分析可能比 RNFL 厚度更有助于评估该人群。