Telem Dana A, Rattner David W, Gee Denise W
Division of Laparoscopic, Bariatric and Advanced GI Surgery, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA,
Surg Endosc. 2014 May;28(5):1494-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3339-z. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether independent virtual endoscopic training accelerates the acquisition of endoscopic skill by novice surgical interns.
Nine novice surgical interns participated in a prospective study comparing colonoscopy performance in a swine model before and after an independent simulator curriculum. An independent observer evaluated each intern for the ability to reach the cecum within 20 min and technical ability as determined by Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills--Colonoscopy (GAGES-C) score and performance compared. In addition, at the conclusion of training, a post test of two basic simulated colonoscopy modules was completed and metrics evaluated. As a control, three attending physicians who routinely perform colonoscopy also completed colonoscopy in the swine model.
Prior to endoscopic training, one (11 %) intern successfully intubated the cecum in 19.56 min. Following training, six (67 %) interns reached the cecum with mean time of 9.2 min (p < 0.05). Statistically significant improvement was demonstrated in four out of five GAGES-C criteria. All three experts reached the cecum, with a mean time of 4.40 min. Comparison of expert and post-curriculum intern times demonstrated the experts to be significantly faster (p < 0.05). Comparison of interns who were and were not able to reach the cecum following the simulator curriculum demonstrated significantly improved GI Mentor™ performance in the efficiency (79 vs. 67.1 %, p = 0.05) and time to cecum (3.37 vs. 5.59 min, p = 0.01) metrics. No other significant difference was demonstrated in GAGES-C categories or other simulator parameter.
Simulator training on the GI Mentor™ alone significantly improved endoscopic skills in novice surgical interns as demonstrated in a swine model. This study also identified parameters on the GI Mentor™ that could indicate 'clinical readiness'. This study supports the role for endoscopic simulator training in surgical resident education as an adjunct to clinical experience.
本研究的目的是确定独立的虚拟内镜训练是否能加速新手外科实习生内镜技能的掌握。
九名新手外科实习生参与了一项前瞻性研究,比较在独立模拟器课程前后,他们在猪模型中的结肠镜检查表现。一名独立观察者评估每位实习生在20分钟内到达盲肠的能力,以及由全球胃肠道内镜技能评估——结肠镜检查(GAGES-C)评分和操作表现所确定的技术能力。此外,在训练结束时,完成了两个基本模拟结肠镜检查模块的后测,并对指标进行评估。作为对照,三名常规进行结肠镜检查的主治医师也在猪模型中完成了结肠镜检查。
在内镜训练前,一名(11%)实习生在19.56分钟内成功插入盲肠。训练后,六名(67%)实习生到达盲肠,平均时间为9.2分钟(p<0.05)。在GAGES-C的五项标准中,有四项显示出统计学上的显著改善。所有三名专家均到达盲肠,平均时间为4.40分钟。专家和课程后实习生时间的比较表明,专家的速度明显更快(p<0.05)。比较模拟器课程后能够和未能到达盲肠的实习生,结果显示在效率(79%对67.1%,p=0.05)和到达盲肠的时间(3.37分钟对5.59分钟,p=0.01)指标上,GI Mentor™的操作表现有显著改善。在GAGES-C类别或其他模拟器参数方面未显示出其他显著差异。
如在猪模型中所示,仅在GI Mentor™上进行模拟器训练可显著提高新手外科实习生的内镜技能。本研究还确定了GI Mentor™上可表明“临床准备就绪”的参数。本研究支持内镜模拟器训练在外科住院医师教育中作为临床经验辅助手段的作用。