Heyne David, Sauter Floor M, Ollendick Thomas H, Van Widenfelt Brigit M, Westenberg P Michiel
Developmental Psychology Unit, Leiden University Institute of Psychology, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB, Leiden, The Netherlands,
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2014 Jun;17(2):191-215. doi: 10.1007/s10567-013-0160-0.
School refusal can be difficult to treat and the poorest treatment response is observed among older school refusers. This poor response may be explained, in part, by the impact of developmental transitions and tasks upon the young person, their family, and the treatment process. This paper describes and illustrates the @school program, a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) designed to promote developmental sensitivity when planning and delivering treatment for adolescent school refusal. Treatment is modularized and it incorporates progress reviews, fostering a planned yet flexible approach to CBT. The treatment is illustrated in the case of Allison, a 16-year-old female presenting with major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. A case formulation guided the selection, sequencing, and pacing of modules targeting predisposing, precipitating, perpetuating, and protective factors. Treatment comprised 16 sessions with Allison (interventions addressing depression, anxiety, and school attendance) and 15 concurrent sessions with her mother (strategies to facilitate an adolescent's school attendance), including two sessions with Allison and mother together (family communication and problem solving to reduce parent-adolescent conflict). Two treatment-related consultations were also conducted with Allison's homeroom teacher. Allison's school attendance improved during the course of treatment. By post-treatment, there was a decrease in internalizing behavior, an increase in self-efficacy, and remission of depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. Clinically significant treatment gains were maintained at 2-month follow-up. Factors influencing outcome may include those inherent to the @school program together with less specific factors. Special consideration is given to parents' use of both authoritative and autonomy-granting approaches when helping an adolescent to attend school.
拒绝上学可能难以治疗,而年龄较大的拒绝上学者的治疗反应最差。这种不佳反应部分可以通过发展转变和任务对年轻人、其家庭以及治疗过程的影响来解释。本文描述并举例说明了@school项目,这是一种认知行为疗法(CBT),旨在在为青少年拒绝上学制定和提供治疗计划时提高对发展的敏感性。治疗采用模块化,纳入了进展评估,培养了一种有计划但灵活的CBT方法。以一名患有重度抑郁症和广泛性焦虑症的16岁女性艾利森为例说明了该治疗方法。一个病例构想指导了针对易患、促发、持续和保护因素的模块的选择、排序和节奏安排。治疗包括与艾利森进行16次疗程(针对抑郁、焦虑和上学出勤的干预)以及与她母亲同时进行15次疗程(促进青少年上学出勤的策略),包括两次艾利森和母亲一起参加的疗程(家庭沟通和解决问题以减少亲子冲突)。还与艾利森的班主任进行了两次与治疗相关的咨询。在治疗过程中,艾利森的上学出勤情况有所改善。到治疗结束时,内化行为减少,自我效能感增强,抑郁症和焦虑症得到缓解。在2个月的随访中,临床显著的治疗效果得以维持。影响治疗结果的因素可能包括@school项目固有的因素以及不太具体的因素。在帮助青少年上学时,特别考虑了父母使用权威和给予自主权的方法。