Suppr超能文献

基于利益相关者观点的学校拒绝干预的路标

Signposts for School Refusal Interventions, Based on the Views of Stakeholders.

作者信息

Heyne David, Brouwer-Borghuis Marije

机构信息

Leiden University, NL.

SWV VO/VSO 2301 Almelo, NL.

出版信息

Contin Educ. 2022 May 18;3(1):25-40. doi: 10.5334/cie.42. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

School refusal (SR) signals a young person's difficulty attending school. It jeopardizes their development, often contributes to distress for parents, and places an extra burden on school personnel. Reviews of empirical studies indicate that intervention for SR helps to increase school attendance, but not for all youths. This practice-based manuscript aims to support practitioners and organisations addressing the needs of youths and families affected by SR. Specifically, we present 14 signposts for the development and delivery of intervention for SR. The signposts represent important conditions for effective intervention based on key findings from the Knowing What Works project in the Netherlands. During that project, 76 professionals shared their views about the important elements in SR interventions they delivered, and 39 youths and 86 parents shared their views about the helpful elements in SR interventions in which they participated. These 201 stakeholders were variously associated with 21 SR interventions across 9 of the 12 Dutch provinces, most situated in mainstream or special education settings. Their responses informed the development of the 14 signposts presented here, supported by the extant literature on SR intervention. We describe the essence of each signpost and conclude with suggestions for using the signposts and evaluating their utility.

摘要

学校拒学(SR)表明年轻人在上学方面存在困难。这会危及他们的发展,常常给家长带来困扰,并给学校工作人员增加额外负担。实证研究综述表明,对学校拒学的干预有助于提高出勤率,但并非对所有青少年都有效。这份基于实践的手稿旨在为应对受学校拒学影响的青少年和家庭需求的从业者及组织提供支持。具体而言,我们提出了14条学校拒学干预发展与实施的路标。这些路标代表了基于荷兰“了解有效方法”项目的关键发现得出的有效干预的重要条件。在该项目中,76名专业人员分享了他们对所实施的学校拒学干预中重要因素的看法,39名青少年和86名家长分享了他们对所参与的学校拒学干预中有益因素的看法。这201名利益相关者与荷兰12个省份中9个省份的21项学校拒学干预措施有着不同程度的关联,这些干预措施大多位于主流或特殊教育环境中。他们的反馈为这里呈现的14条路标提供了参考依据,并得到了现有学校拒学干预文献的支持。我们描述了每条路标的要点,并以关于使用这些路标及评估其效用的建议作为结尾。

相似文献

1
Signposts for School Refusal Interventions, Based on the Views of Stakeholders.
Contin Educ. 2022 May 18;3(1):25-40. doi: 10.5334/cie.42. eCollection 2022.
2
Practitioner Review: Signposts for Enhancing Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for School Refusal in Adolescence.
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2023 Jan;51(1):61-76. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000899. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
4
Trajectories of school refusal: sequence analysis using retrospective parent reports.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Nov;33(11):3849-3859. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02419-5. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
5
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018.
7
A Scoping Review of Constructs Measured Following Intervention for School Refusal: Are We Measuring Up?
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 20;11:1744. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01744. eCollection 2020.
8
Developmental Issues Associated with Adolescent School Refusal and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Manuals.
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2022 Nov;50(6):471-494. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000881. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
9
Outcome of a Multi-modal CBT-based Treatment Program for Chronic School Refusal.
Glob Pediatr Health. 2021 Mar 30;8:2333794X211002952. doi: 10.1177/2333794X211002952. eCollection 2021.
10
Rapid Return for School Refusal: A School-Based Approach Applied With Japanese Adolescents.
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 20;10:2862. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02862. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Teachers' experiences with the Back2School intervention-a pilot study addressing problematic school absenteeism.
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 4;16:1608184. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1608184. eCollection 2025.
3
Qualitative Study Examining Attendance for Secondary School Pupils With Long-Term Physical Health Conditions.
Contin Educ. 2024 May 15;5(1):76-89. doi: 10.5334/cie.111. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Longitudinal pathways between emotional difficulties and school absenteeism in middle childhood: Evidence from developmental cascades.
Dev Psychopathol. 2023 Aug;35(3):1323-1334. doi: 10.1017/S095457942100122X. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
2
Inpatient with an Anxious School Refusal: A Retrospective Study.
Psychiatr Danub. 2021 Sep;33(Suppl 9):69-74.
3
Multifamily Therapy for Adolescents With School Refusal: Perspectives of the Adolescents and Their Parents.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 10;12:624841. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.624841. eCollection 2021.
4
A Scoping Review of Constructs Measured Following Intervention for School Refusal: Are We Measuring Up?
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 20;11:1744. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01744. eCollection 2020.
5
Secondary school practitioners' beliefs about risk factors for school attendance problems: a qualitative study.
Emot Behav Diffic. 2019 Aug 1;25(1):15-28. doi: 10.1080/13632752.2019.1647684. eCollection 2020.
6
A Multidimensional, Multi-tiered System of Supports Model to Promote School Attendance and Address School Absenteeism.
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2020 Sep;23(3):316-337. doi: 10.1007/s10567-020-00317-1.
7
Improving school attendance by enhancing communication among stakeholders: establishment of the International Network for School Attendance (INSA).
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;29(7):1023-1030. doi: 10.1007/s00787-019-01380-y. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
8
Role theory of schools and adolescent health.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019 Oct;3(10):742-748. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30183-X. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
10
The Link Between School Attendance and Good Health.
Pediatrics. 2019 Feb;143(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3648.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验