• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青春期早期将受欢迎程度置于优先地位的不良影响。

Aggressive effects of prioritizing popularity in early adolescence.

作者信息

Cillessen Antonius H N, Mayeux Lara, Ha Thao, de Bruyn Eddy H, LaFontana Kathryn M

机构信息

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Aggress Behav. 2014 May-Jun;40(3):204-13. doi: 10.1002/ab.21518. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1002/ab.21518
PMID:24338722
Abstract

This study examined the moderating effects of prioritizing popularity on the association between early adolescents' popularity and their aggressive, leadership, and prosocial behaviors with peers. Participants were 288 14-year-olds from The Netherlands who completed a sociometric instrument and an assessment of how much they prioritized popularity over other personal goals. Results indicated that prioritizing popularity was distinct from actual popularity in the peer group. Further, prioritizing popularity moderated the association of popularity with aggressive and leadership behaviors, with adolescents who were both popular and who prioritized popularity being particularly aggressive and scoring high on leadership behaviors. This trend was especially true for boys. The same moderating effect was not found for prosocial behaviors. Motivational and social-cognitive factors in the dynamics of peer popularity are highlighted.

摘要

本研究考察了将受欢迎程度置于优先地位对青少年早期的受欢迎程度与其与同伴的攻击性行为、领导行为和亲社会行为之间关联的调节作用。参与者是来自荷兰的288名14岁青少年,他们完成了一份社会测量工具以及一项关于他们将受欢迎程度置于其他个人目标之上的程度的评估。结果表明,将受欢迎程度置于优先地位与同龄人中的实际受欢迎程度是不同的。此外,将受欢迎程度置于优先地位调节了受欢迎程度与攻击性行为和领导行为之间的关联,那些既受欢迎又将受欢迎程度置于优先地位的青少年尤其具有攻击性,并且在领导行为方面得分较高。这种趋势在男孩中尤为明显。亲社会行为未发现同样的调节作用。研究强调了同伴受欢迎程度动态中的动机和社会认知因素。

相似文献

1
Aggressive effects of prioritizing popularity in early adolescence.青春期早期将受欢迎程度置于优先地位的不良影响。
Aggress Behav. 2014 May-Jun;40(3):204-13. doi: 10.1002/ab.21518. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
2
Moderators of the association between relational aggression and perceived popularity.关系攻击与感知受欢迎程度之间关联的调节因素。
Aggress Behav. 2008 Nov-Dec;34(6):563-76. doi: 10.1002/ab.20280.
3
The role of popularity goal in early adolescents' behaviors and popularity status.受欢迎目标在青少年早期行为和受欢迎状态中的作用。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Feb;50(2):489-97. doi: 10.1037/a0032999. Epub 2013 May 20.
4
Popularity differentially predicts reactive and proactive aggression in early adolescence.受欢迎程度对青少年早期的反应性攻击和主动性攻击有不同的预测作用。
Aggress Behav. 2016 Jan-Feb;42(1):29-40. doi: 10.1002/ab.21603. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
5
Adolescents' social status goals: relationships to social status insecurity, aggression, and prosocial behavior.青少年的社会地位目标:与社会地位不安全感、攻击性和亲社会行为的关系。
J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Jan;43(1):146-60. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9939-z. Epub 2013 Mar 23.
6
Popularity and Resource Control Goals as Predictors of Adolescent Indirect Aggression.受欢迎程度和资源控制目标作为青少年间接攻击行为的预测因素
J Genet Psychol. 2015 May-Aug;176(3-4):253-9. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2015.1048661.
7
Friendship Dynamics of Adolescent Aggression, Prosocial Behavior, and Social Status: The Moderating Role of Gender.青少年攻击行为、亲社会行为和社会地位的友谊动态:性别调节作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Nov;46(11):2305-2320. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0702-8. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
8
Peer status and aggression as predictors of dating popularity in adolescence.同伴地位和攻击性对青少年约会受欢迎程度的预测作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2015 Mar;44(3):683-95. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0174-z. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
9
How to Attain a Popularity Goal? Examining the Mediation Effects of Popularity Determinants and Behaviors.如何实现受欢迎的目标?检验受欢迎程度决定因素和行为的中介效应。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Sep;47(9):1842-1852. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0882-x. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
10
Behavioral Correlates of Prioritizing Popularity in Adolescence.青少年时期将受欢迎程度置于优先地位的行为关联
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Dec;45(12):2444-2454. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0352-7. Epub 2015 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Leaders of Peer Groups in Chinese Early Adolescents: The Roles of Social, Academic, and Psychological Characteristics in Group Leadership.中国青少年同伴群体中的领导者:社会、学业和心理特征在群体领导中的作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Sep;53(9):2151-2164. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02003-9. Epub 2024 May 15.
2
Positive and Negative Leadership in Late Childhood: Similarities in Individual but Differences in Interpersonal Characteristics.积极领导力和消极领导力在儿童晚期的体现:个体特征相似,但人际特征不同。
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Aug;52(8):1620-1631. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01798-3. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
3
Vocal Expression of Affective States in Spontaneous Laughter reveals the Bright and the Dark Side of Laughter.
自发笑声中的情感表达揭示了笑声的光明面和黑暗面。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 4;12(1):5613. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09416-1.
4
Bullying Prevention in Adolescence: Solutions and New Challenges from the Past Decade.青少年欺凌预防:过去十年的解决方案和新挑战。
J Res Adolesc. 2021 Dec;31(4):1023-1046. doi: 10.1111/jora.12688.
5
More popular because you're older? Relative age effect on popularity among adolescents in class.更受欢迎是因为年龄更大吗?班级中青少年相对年龄对受欢迎程度的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 May 5;16(5):e0249336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249336. eCollection 2021.
6
HEXACO personality correlates of adolescents' involvement in bullying situations.青少年卷入欺凌情境的 HEXACO 人格相关因素。
Aggress Behav. 2021 May;47(3):320-331. doi: 10.1002/ab.21947. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
7
Bidirectional Associations between Popularity, Popularity Goal, and Aggression, Alcohol Use and Prosocial Behaviors in Adolescence: A 3-Year Prospective Longitudinal Study.青少年受欢迎程度、受欢迎目标与攻击行为、酒精使用及亲社会行为之间的双向关联:一项为期3年的前瞻性纵向研究
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Feb;50(2):298-313. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01308-9. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
8
The Association Between Relational Aggression and Perceived Popularity in Early Adolescence: A Test of Competing Hypotheses.青少年早期关系型攻击行为与感知受欢迎程度之间的关联:竞争性假设检验
J Early Adolesc. 2017 Oct;37(8):1078-1092. doi: 10.1177/0272431616642327. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
9
Differences in perceived popularity and social preference between bullying roles and class norms.在感知受欢迎程度和社会偏好方面,欺凌角色与班级规范之间存在差异。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 10;14(10):e0223499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223499. eCollection 2019.
10
Friendship Network Dynamics of Aggressive and Rule-Breaking Antisocial Behaviors in Adolescence.青少年中具有攻击性和违反规则的反社会行为的友谊网络动态。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Oct;48(10):2065-2078. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01109-9. Epub 2019 Aug 22.