Department of Sociology, University of Groningen, Grote Rozenstraat 31, 9712 TG, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Aug;52(8):1620-1631. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01798-3. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
Previous research has shown that leadership is associated not only with positive but also with negative characteristics and behaviors; knowledge of the similarities and differences between positive and negative leaders remains insufficient. This study aimed to examine (1) the existence of different subtypes of leaders and (2) to what extent these leaders differed on individual and interpersonal characteristics. The sample contained 9213 students in grades 3-6 (Dutch grades 5-8), from 392 classrooms in 98 schools (50.3% girls, M = 10.13 ± 1.23 years). Latent profile analysis identified three leader profiles and four non-leader profiles based on peer nominations received for leadership, popularity, and positive (defending) and negative (bullying) behavior: (1) positive leaders, (2) negative leaders, (3) non-popular leaders, (4) popular children, (5) bullies, (6) extreme bullies, and (7) modal children. Multinomial logistic regression showed similarities and differences between positive and negative leaders, as well as between each of these and the other five profiles. Positive leaders were more accepted and less rejected and had more friendships than negative leaders, but the differences in individual characteristics (self-esteem, self-control, and social goals) were less clear. This study demonstrated that 10-15% of the children were perceived as leaders, and that positive leadership became more prevalent in the higher grades. Nevertheless, negative leadership occurred also in the higher grades. Interventions aimed at turning negative leaders into positive leaders may work, because positive and negative leaders do not differ greatly in individual characteristics. Such interventions may improve the relationships of negative leaders with their classmates, which may be good for their likeability (but not at the expense of their popularity) as well as for the social atmosphere in the class as a whole.
先前的研究表明,领导力不仅与积极特征和行为相关,也与消极特征和行为相关;对积极领导者和消极领导者之间的相似性和差异性的了解仍然不足。本研究旨在检验:(1)不同类型领导者的存在,以及 (2)这些领导者在个体和人际特征上的差异程度。研究样本包括来自 98 所学校的 392 个班级的 9213 名 3-6 年级学生(荷兰的 5-8 年级)(女生占 50.3%,M=10.13±1.23 岁)。基于同伴提名的领导能力、受欢迎程度、积极(防御)和消极(欺凌)行为,潜在剖面分析识别出了三种领导类型和四种非领导类型:(1)积极型领导者,(2)消极型领导者,(3)不受欢迎的领导者,(4)受欢迎的孩子,(5)欺凌者,(6)极端欺凌者,和(7)普通孩子。多项逻辑回归显示了积极领导者和消极领导者之间的相似性和差异性,以及他们与其他五个类型之间的相似性和差异性。积极领导者比消极领导者更受欢迎、更少被拒绝,且拥有更多的友谊,但个体特征(自尊、自我控制和社会目标)的差异不太明显。本研究表明,10-15%的孩子被认为是领导者,而且积极领导力在高年级更为普遍。尽管如此,消极领导力也存在于高年级。将消极领导者转变为积极领导者的干预措施可能会起作用,因为积极领导者和消极领导者在个体特征上没有太大差异。这些干预措施可能会改善消极领导者与同学的关系,这可能会提高他们的受喜爱程度(但不是以牺牲他们的受欢迎程度为代价),以及整个班级的社会氛围。