Suppr超能文献

青少年卷入欺凌情境的 HEXACO 人格相关因素。

HEXACO personality correlates of adolescents' involvement in bullying situations.

机构信息

Clinical Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Aggress Behav. 2021 May;47(3):320-331. doi: 10.1002/ab.21947. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

Abstract

Adolescents' involvement in bullying situations is-at least partially-personality trait-activated. Although some studies investigated personality correlates of bullying and being victimized, little is known about personality correlates of bystander responses (i.e., reinforcing, outsider behavior, indirect defending, and direct defending). The present study investigated whether Dutch adolescents' self-reported HEXACO personality traits could explain their peer-reported involvement in bullying (N = 552; M  = 13.4 years, SD = 0.8 years). The results show that bullying was negatively related to honesty-humility, emotionality, agreeableness (for boys specifically), and openness, whereas reinforcing was only negatively related to honesty-humility and openness. Conversely, direct defending and outsider behavior were positively related to honesty-humility, emotionality, and openness, whereas indirect defending was only positively related to emotionality and openness. Furthermore, reinforcing was positively related to extraversion (for boys only), whereas outsider behavior was negatively related extraversion and positively to conscientiousness. Finally, being victimized was positively related to emotionality and negatively to extraversion. These findings contribute to our understanding of the heterogeneity in adolescents' involvement in bullying and fit the view of bullying and defending as strategic and goal-directed behavior. Implications for bullying prevention programs are discussed.

摘要

青少年参与欺凌行为至少部分是由人格特质激活的。虽然一些研究调查了欺凌和受害的人格相关性,但对于旁观者反应(即强化、局外行为、间接防御和直接防御)的人格相关性知之甚少。本研究调查了荷兰青少年自我报告的 HEXACO 人格特质是否可以解释他们在同伴报告中的欺凌行为(N=552;M=13.4 岁,SD=0.8 岁)。结果表明,欺凌与诚实-谦逊、情绪性、宜人性(特别是对男孩)和开放性呈负相关,而强化仅与诚实-谦逊和开放性呈负相关。相反,直接防御和局外行为与诚实-谦逊、情绪性和开放性呈正相关,而间接防御仅与情绪性和开放性呈正相关。此外,强化与外向性呈正相关(仅对男孩),而局外行为与外向性呈负相关,与尽责性呈正相关。最后,受害与情绪性呈正相关,与外向性呈负相关。这些发现有助于我们理解青少年参与欺凌行为的异质性,并符合将欺凌和防御视为策略性和目标导向行为的观点。讨论了欺凌预防计划的影响。

相似文献

1
HEXACO personality correlates of adolescents' involvement in bullying situations.
Aggress Behav. 2021 May;47(3):320-331. doi: 10.1002/ab.21947. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Using the HEXACO to explain the structure of borderline and psychopathic personality traits.
Personal Ment Health. 2023 Nov;17(4):352-362. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1584. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
3
Workplace bullies, not their victims, score high on the Dark Triad and Extraversion, and low on Agreeableness and Honesty-Humility.
Heliyon. 2019 Oct 11;5(10):e02609. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02609. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
Longitudinal Associations Between Adolescents' Bullying-Related Indirect Defending, Outsider Behavior, and Peer-Group Status.
J Res Adolesc. 2020 Jan;30 Suppl 1:87-99. doi: 10.1111/jora.12450. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
5
What Is Engagement? Proactivity as the Missing Link in the HEXACO Model of Personality.
J Pers. 2016 Apr;84(2):178-93. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12150. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
6
How HEXACO personality traits are involved in school performance of middle school adolescents (10-14 years).
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Jul;247:104319. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104319. Epub 2024 May 17.
7
The HEXACO Personality Space Before and After Re-Rotation to Approximate the Big Five Dimensions.
J Pers Assess. 2024 Mar-Apr;106(2):145-155. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2023.2229427. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
8
Who wants to change and how? On the trait-specificity of personality change goals.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Nov;121(5):1112-1139. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000304. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
9
The Nomological Net of the HEXACO Model of Personality: A Large-Scale Meta-Analytic Investigation.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 May;15(3):723-760. doi: 10.1177/1745691619895036. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
10
The HEXACO Adjective Scales and Its Psychometric Properties.
Assessment. 2023 Dec;30(8):2510-2532. doi: 10.1177/10731911231153833. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Construct and criterion validity of the HEXACO Medium School Inventory Extended (MSI-E).
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 13;18(10):e0292813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292813. eCollection 2023.
2
Dark tetrad personality traits also play a role in bullying victimization.
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 14;13:984744. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.984744. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in adolescents' motivations for indirect, direct, and hybrid peer defending.
Soc Dev. 2019 May;28(2):414-429. doi: 10.1111/sode.12348. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
2
Longitudinal Associations Between Adolescents' Bullying-Related Indirect Defending, Outsider Behavior, and Peer-Group Status.
J Res Adolesc. 2020 Jan;30 Suppl 1:87-99. doi: 10.1111/jora.12450. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
4
Methodological Choices in Peer Nomination Research.
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2017 Sep;2017(157):21-44. doi: 10.1002/cad.20206.
5
The Meaningful Roles Intervention: An Evolutionary Approach to Reducing Bullying and Increasing Prosocial Behavior.
J Res Adolesc. 2016 Dec;26(4):622-637. doi: 10.1111/jora.12243. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
7
Defending victimized peers: Opposing the bully, supporting the victim, or both?
Aggress Behav. 2016 Nov;42(6):585-597. doi: 10.1002/ab.21653. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
8
The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality factors: a review of research and theory.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2014 May;18(2):139-52. doi: 10.1177/1088868314523838. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
9
Aggressive effects of prioritizing popularity in early adolescence.
Aggress Behav. 2014 May-Jun;40(3):204-13. doi: 10.1002/ab.21518. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
10
Children's intervention strategies in situations of victimization by bullying: social cognitions of outsiders versus defenders.
J Sch Psychol. 2013 Dec;51(6):669-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验