Santulli-Marotto Sandra, Boakye Ken, Lacy Eilyn, Wu Sheng-Jiun, Luongo Jennifer, Kavalkovich Karl, Coelho Ana, Hogaboam Cory M, Ryan Mary
Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania, United States of America ; Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 5;8(12):e81465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081465. eCollection 2013.
CCL17 (TARC) function can be completely abolished by mAbs that block either one of two distinct sites required for CCR4 signaling. This chemokine is elevated in sera of asthma patients and is responsible for establishing inflammatory sites through CCR4-mediated recruitment of immune cells. CCL17 shares the GPCR CCR4, with CCL22 (MDC) but these two chemokines differentially affect the immune response. To better understand chemokine mediated effects through CCR4, we have generated chimeric anti-mouse CCL17 surrogate antibodies that inhibit function of this ligand in vitro and in vivo. The affinities of the surrogate antibodies for CCL17 range from 685 pM for B225 to 4.9 nM for B202. One antibody, B202, also exhibits weak binding to CCL22 (KD∼2 µM) and no binding to CCL22 is detectable with the second antibody, B225. In vitro, both antibodies inhibit CCL17-mediated calcium mobilization, β-arrestin recruitment and chemotaxis; B202 can also partially inhibit CCL22-mediated β-arrestin recruitment. Both B202 and B225 antibodies neutralize CCL17 in vivo as demonstrated by reduction of methacholine-induced airway hyperreactivity in the A. fumigatus model of asthma. That both antibodies block CCL17 function but only B202 shows any inhibition of CCL22 function suggests that they bind CCL17 at different sites. Competition binding studies confirm that these two antibodies recognize unique epitopes that are non-overlapping despite the small size of CCL17. Taking into consideration the data from both the functional and binding studies, we propose that effective engagement of CCR4 by CCL17 involves two distinct binding domains and interaction with both is required for signaling.
CCL17(TARC)的功能可被阻断CCR4信号传导所需的两个不同位点之一的单克隆抗体完全消除。这种趋化因子在哮喘患者血清中升高,并通过CCR4介导的免疫细胞募集来建立炎症部位。CCL17与CCL22(MDC)共享GPCR CCR4,但这两种趋化因子对免疫反应的影响不同。为了更好地理解趋化因子通过CCR4介导的作用,我们制备了嵌合抗小鼠CCL17替代抗体,这些抗体在体外和体内均能抑制该配体的功能。替代抗体对CCL17的亲和力范围从B225的685 pM到B202的4.9 nM。一种抗体B202也与CCL22表现出弱结合(KD约为2 μM),而第二种抗体B225未检测到与CCL22的结合。在体外,两种抗体均抑制CCL17介导的钙动员、β-抑制蛋白募集和趋化作用;B202还可部分抑制CCL22介导的β-抑制蛋白募集。在烟曲霉哮喘模型中,B202和B225抗体均能在体内中和CCL17,表现为乙酰甲胆碱诱导的气道高反应性降低。两种抗体均阻断CCL17功能,但只有B202对CCL22功能有任何抑制作用,这表明它们在不同位点结合CCL17。竞争结合研究证实,这两种抗体识别独特的表位,尽管CCL17体积小,但这些表位并不重叠。综合功能和结合研究的数据,我们提出CCL17对CCR4的有效结合涉及两个不同的结合域,信号传导需要与两者相互作用。