Leukocyte Biology Section, Medical Research Council-Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, National Heart and Lung Institute Division, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom;
J Immunol. 2014 Apr 1;192(7):3419-27. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300232. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) is expressed by Th2 and regulatory T cells and directs their migration along gradients of the chemokines CCL17 and CCL22. Both chemokines and receptor are upregulated in allergic disease, making CCR4 a therapeutic target for the treatment of allergy. We set out to assess the mechanisms underlying a previous report that CCL22 is a dominant ligand of CCR4, which may have implications for its therapeutic targeting. Human T cells expressing endogenous CCR4 and transfectants engineered to express CCR4 were assessed for receptor function, using assays of calcium release, chemotaxis, receptor endocytosis, and ligand binding. Despite the two ligands having equal potency in calcium flux and chemotaxis assays, CCL22 showed dominance in both receptor endocytosis assays and heterologous competitive binding assays. Using two different CCR4-specific Abs, we showed that CCR4 exists in at least two distinct conformations, which are differentially activated by ligand. A major population is activated by both CCL17 and CCL22, whereas a minor population is activated only by CCL22. Mutation of a single C-terminal residue K310 within a putative CCR4 antagonist binding site ablated activation of CCR4 by CCL17, but not by CCL22, despite having no effect on the binding of either ligand. We conclude that CCL17 and CCL22 are conformationally selective ligands of CCR4 and interact with the receptor by substantially different mechanisms. This finding suggests that the selective blockade of CCR4 in allergy may be feasible when one CCR4 ligand dominates, allowing the inhibition of Th2 signaling via one ligand while sparing regulatory T cell recruitment via another.
CC 趋化因子受体 4(CCR4)表达于 Th2 和调节性 T 细胞上,引导它们沿着趋化因子 CCL17 和 CCL22 的浓度梯度迁移。在过敏疾病中,这两种趋化因子及其受体都上调,使得 CCR4 成为治疗过敏的治疗靶点。我们着手评估之前一份报告的机制,该报告表明 CCL22 是 CCR4 的主要配体,这可能对其治疗靶向具有影响。使用钙释放、趋化性、受体内吞和配体结合测定法,评估表达内源性 CCR4 的人 T 细胞和工程改造以表达 CCR4 的转染子的受体功能。尽管这两种配体在钙流和趋化性测定中具有相同的效力,但 CCL22 在两种受体内吞测定和异源竞争性结合测定中均显示出优势。使用两种不同的 CCR4 特异性 Abs,我们表明 CCR4 至少存在两种不同的构象,这些构象被配体以不同的方式激活。一个主要群体被 CCL17 和 CCL22 激活,而一个较小的群体仅被 CCL22 激活。在假定的 CCR4 拮抗剂结合位点内的单个 C 末端残基 K310 处的突变消除了 CCL17 对 CCR4 的激活,但对 CCL22 的激活没有影响,尽管这对两种配体的结合都没有影响。我们得出结论,CCL17 和 CCL22 是 CCR4 的构象选择性配体,通过完全不同的机制与受体相互作用。这一发现表明,当一种 CCR4 配体占主导地位时,在过敏中选择性阻断 CCR4 可能是可行的,允许通过一种配体抑制 Th2 信号,而通过另一种配体避免调节性 T 细胞募集。