Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 6, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Rd, Melbourne 3004, VIC, Australia.
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Dec 17;13:169. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-169.
Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) is a core unit delivered across many medical schools. Few studies have investigated the most effective method of teaching a course in EBM to medical students. The objective of this study was to identify whether a blended-learning approach to teaching EBM is more effective a didactic-based approach at increasing medical student competency in EBM.
A mixed-methods study was conducted consisting of a controlled trial and focus groups with second year graduate medical students. Students received the EBM course delivered using either a didactic approach (DID) to learning EBM or a blended-learning approach (BL). Student competency in EBM was assessed using the Berlin tool and a criterion-based assessment task, with student perceptions on the interventions assessed qualitatively.
A total of 61 students (85.9%) participated in the study. Competency in EBM did not differ between the groups when assessed using the Berlin tool (p = 0.29). Students using the BL approach performed significantly better in one of the criterion-based assessment tasks (p = 0.01) and reported significantly higher self-perceived competence in critical appraisal skills. Qualitative analysis identified that students had a preference for the EBM course to be delivered using the BL approach.
Implementing a blended-learning approach to EBM teaching promotes greater student appreciation of EBM principles within the clinical setting. Integrating a variety of teaching modalities and approaches can increase student self-confidence and assist in bridging the gap between the theory and practice of EBM.
循证医学(EBM)是许多医学院开设的核心课程。很少有研究调查向医学生教授 EBM 课程的最有效方法。本研究的目的是确定混合学习方法在提高医学生 EBM 能力方面是否比基于说教的方法更有效。
本研究采用混合方法设计,包括一项对照试验和对二年级研究生医学生的焦点小组。学生接受循证医学课程的教学,采用说教式(DID)学习循证医学方法或混合学习方法(BL)。使用柏林工具和基于标准的评估任务评估学生的循证医学能力,定性评估学生对干预措施的看法。
共有 61 名学生(85.9%)参与了研究。使用柏林工具评估时,两组学生的循证医学能力没有差异(p=0.29)。使用 BL 方法的学生在一项基于标准的评估任务中表现明显更好(p=0.01),并报告在批判性评估技能方面的自我感知能力显著提高。定性分析表明,学生更喜欢采用 BL 方法来教授循证医学课程。
实施循证医学教学的混合学习方法可以促进学生在临床环境中更好地理解循证医学原则。整合各种教学模式和方法可以提高学生的自信心,并有助于弥合循证医学理论与实践之间的差距。