Bieri Andreas, Oser-Meier Monika, Janner Marco, Cripe-Mamie Chantal, Pipczynski-Suter Kathrin, Mullis Primus E, Flück Christa E
Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetology & Metabolism, University Children's Hospital, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 15, CH - 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Int J Pediatr Endocrinol. 2013 Dec 17;2013(1):21. doi: 10.1186/1687-9856-2013-21.
Morbidity and mortality in T1DM depend on metabolic control, which is assessed by HbA1c measurements every 3-4 months. Patients' self-perception of glycemic control depends on daily blood glucose monitoring. Little is known about the congruence of patients' and professionals' perception of metabolic control in T1DM.
To assess the actual patients' self-perception and objective assessment (HbA1c) of metabolic control in T1DM children and adolescents and to investigate the possible factors involved in any difference.
Patients with T1DM aged 8 - 18 years were recruited in a cross-sectional, retrospective and prospective cohort study. Data collection consisted of clinical details, measured HbA1c, self-monitored blood glucose values and questionnaires assessing self and professionals' judgment of metabolic control.
91 patients participated. Mean HbA1c was 8.03%. HbA1c was higher in patients with a diabetes duration > 2 years (p = 0.025) and in patients of lower socioeconomic level (p = 0.032). No significant correlation was found for self-perception of metabolic control in well and poorly controlled patients. We found a trend towards false-positive memory of the last HbA1c in patients with a HbA1c > 8.5% (p = 0.069) but no difference in patients' knowledge on target HbA1c between well and poorly controlled patients.
T1DM patients are aware of a target HbA1c representing good metabolic control. Ill controlled patients appear to have a poorer recollection of their HbA1c. Self-perception of actual metabolic control is similar in well and poorly controlled T1DM children and adolescents. Therefore, professionals should pay special attention that ill controlled T1DM patients perceive their HbA1c correctly.
1型糖尿病的发病率和死亡率取决于代谢控制情况,每3 - 4个月通过糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)测量来评估。患者对血糖控制的自我认知取决于日常血糖监测。关于1型糖尿病患者与专业人员对代谢控制认知的一致性,目前所知甚少。
评估1型糖尿病儿童和青少年患者对代谢控制的实际自我认知以及客观评估(HbA1c),并调查造成差异的可能因素。
在一项横断面、回顾性和前瞻性队列研究中招募了8 - 18岁的1型糖尿病患者。数据收集包括临床细节、测量的HbA1c、自我监测的血糖值以及评估自我和专业人员对代谢控制判断的问卷。
91名患者参与。平均HbA1c为8.03%。糖尿病病程>2年的患者以及社会经济水平较低的患者HbA1c更高(p = 0.025和p = 0.032)。血糖控制良好和不佳的患者在代谢控制自我认知方面未发现显著相关性。我们发现HbA1c>8.5%的患者对最近一次HbA1c有假阳性记忆的趋势(p = 0.069),但血糖控制良好和不佳的患者在目标HbA1c知识方面没有差异。
1型糖尿病患者知晓代表良好代谢控制的目标HbA1c。血糖控制不佳的患者似乎对自己的HbA1c记忆较差。血糖控制良好和不佳的1型糖尿病儿童和青少年对实际代谢控制的自我认知相似。因此,专业人员应特别注意确保血糖控制不佳的1型糖尿病患者正确认识自己的HbA1c。